| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Address correspondence and reprint requests to T. J. Gan, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to gan00001@ mc.duke.edu.
The debate over colloid versus crystalloid as the best solution for intraoperative fluid resuscitation is not resolved. Published studies have shown that mortality is not related to the specific fluid used for resuscitation. In addition, the quality of postoperative recovery between colloid and crystalloid has not been well investigated. In a prospective, blinded fashion, we investigated the effects of colloid and crystalloid resuscitation on nausea and vomiting and on the postoperative patient recovery profile. Patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery were randomized to receive 6% hetastarch in saline (HS-NS), 6% hetastarch in balanced salt (HS-BS), or lactated Ringers solution (LR) on the basis of a fluid administration algorithm. The anesthetic was standardized. Hemodynamic targets included maintenance of arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output within a predefined range. A postoperative morbidity survey was performed at baseline and daily after surgery. Ninety patients participated in the study, with 30 patients in each group. The amounts of study fluid (mean ± SD) administered were 1301 ± 1079 mL, 1448 ± 759 mL, and 5946 ± 1909 mL for the HS-NS, HS-BS, and LR groups, respectively (P < 0.05, HS-NS and HS-BS versus LR). Both the HS-NS and HS-BS (colloid) groups had a significantly less frequent incidence of nausea and vomiting, use of rescue antiemetics, severe pain, periorbital edema, and double vision. We concluded that intraoperative fluid resuscitation with colloid, when compared with crystalloid administration, is associated with an improvement in the quality of postoperative recovery.
IMPLICATIONS: Intraoperative resuscitation with colloid reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves the quality of postoperative recovery when compared with crystalloid resuscitation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Handy and N. Soni Physiological effects of hyperchloraemia and acidosis Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 141 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Gan Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1884 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Roche, M. F. M. James, E. Bennett-Guerrero, and M. G. Mythen A Head-to-Head Comparison of the In Vitro Coagulation Effects of Saline-Based and Balanced Electrolyte Crystalloid and Colloid Intravenous Fluids. Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2006; 102(4): 1274 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Hamilton, M. G. Mythen, and G. L. Ackland Less is not more: a lack of evidence for intraoperative fluid restriction improving outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery. Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 970 - 971. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Spahn and P.-G. Chassot CON: Fluid Restriction for Cardiac Patients During Major Noncardiac Surgery Should be Replaced by Goal-Directed Intravascular Fluid Administration Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 344 - 346. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. N. O'Malley, R. J. Frumento, M. A. Hardy, A. I. Benvenisty, T. E. Brentjens, J. S. Mercer, and E. Bennett-Guerrero A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Lactated Ringer's Solution and 0.9% NaCl During Renal Transplantation Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1518 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Mythen Postoperative Gastrointestinal Tract Dysfunction Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 196 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Habib and T. J. Gan Evidence-based management of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a review: [Le traitement des nausees et des vomissements postoperatoires fonde sur des donnees probantes : une revue] Can J Anesth, April 1, 2004; 51(4): 326 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|