| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco
Address correspondence and reprint requests to James M. Sonner, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Room S-455I, Box 0464, 513 Parnassus Ave., University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0464. Address e-mail to sonnerj{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu
The enhancing action of propofol on
-amino-n-butyric acid subtype A (GABAA) receptors purportedly underlies its anesthetic effects. However, a recent study found that a GABAA antagonist did not alter the capacity of propofol to depress the righting reflex. We examined whether the noncompetitive GABAA antagonist picrotoxin and the competitive GABAA antagonist gabazine affected a different anesthetic response, immobility in response to a noxious stimulus (a tail clamp in rats), produced by propofol. This effect was compared with that seen with ketamine and isoflurane. Picrotoxin increased the 50% effective dose (ED50) for propofol by approximately 379%; gabazine increased it by 362%, and both antagonists acted in a dose-related manner with no apparent ceiling effect (i.e., no limit). Picrotoxin maximally increased the ED50 for ketamine by approximately 40%50%, whereas gabazine increased it by 50%60%. The isoflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration increased by approximately 60% with the picrotoxin and 70% with the gabazine infusion. The ED50 for propofol was also antagonized by strychnine, a non-GABAergic glycine receptor antagonist and convulsant, to determine whether excitation of the central nervous system by a non-GABAergic mechanism could account for the increases in propofol ED50 observed. Because strychnine only increased the immobilizing ED50 of propofol by approximately 50%, GABAA receptor antagonism accounted for the results seen with picrotoxin and gabazine. We conclude that GABAA antagonism can influence the ED50 for immobility of propofol and the non-GABAergic anesthetic ketamine, although to a different degree, reflecting physiologic antagonism for ketamine (i.e., an indirect effect via a modulatory effect on the neural circuitry underlying immobility) versus physiologic and pharmacologic antagonism for propofol (i.e., a direct effect by antagonism of propofols mechanism of action). This study also suggests that the immobilizing action of isoflurane probably does not involve the GABAA receptor because antagonism of GABAA receptors for animals anesthetized with isoflurane produces results quantitatively and qualitatively similar to ketamine and markedly different from propofol.
IMPLICATIONS: IV picrotoxin and gabazine antagonized the immobilizing action of propofol in a dose-related manner, whereas antagonism of the immobilizing action of ketamine and isoflurane was similar, smaller than for propofol, and not dose-related. These results are consistent with a role for
-amino-n-butyric acid subtype A receptors in mediating propofol anesthesia but not ketamine or isoflurane anesthesia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility? Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yao, J. Kim, R. Atherley, S. L. Jinks, E. Carstens, S. Shargh, A. Sulger, and J. F. Antognini The Effects of Aromatic Anesthetics on Dorsal Horn Neuronal Responses to Noxious Stimulation Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1759 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tung, S. Herrera, C. A. Fornal, and B. L. Jacobs The Effect of Prolonged Anesthesia with Isoflurane, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine, or Ketamine on Neural Cell Proliferation in the Adult Rat Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1772 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Haines, L. M. Mao, L. Yang, A. Arora, E. E. Fibuch, and J. Q. Wang Modulation of AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit phosphorylation in neurons by the intravenous anaesthetic propofol Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 676 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Jia, M. Yue, D. Chandra, G. E. Homanics, P. A. Goldstein, and N. L. Harrison Isoflurane Is a Potent Modulator of Extrasynaptic GABAA Receptors in the Thalamus J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1127 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mourisse, J. Lerou, M. Struys, M. Zwarts, and L. Booij Multi-level approach to anaesthetic effects produced by sevoflurane or propofol in humans: 2. BIS and tetanic stimulus-induced withdrawal reflex Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 746 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Grasshoff and B. Antkowiak Effects of isoflurane and enflurane on GABAA and glycine receptors contribute equally to depressant actions on spinal ventral horn neurones in rats Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 687 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Brosnan, D. Gong, J. Cotten, B. Keshavaprasad, C. S. Yost, E. I. Eger II, and J. M. Sonner Chirality in Anesthesia II: Stereoselective Modulation of Ion Channel Function by Secondary Alcohol Enantiomers. Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 86 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Sou, M.-H. Chan, and H.-H. Chen Ketamine, but not propofol, anaesthesia is regulated by metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2006; 96(5): 597 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chen, S. Shu, and D. A. Bayliss Suppression of Ih Contributes to Propofol-Induced Inhibition of Mouse Cortical Pyramidal Neurons J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3872 - 3883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Orth, L. Barter, C. Dominguez, R. Atherley, E. Carstens, and J. F. Antognini Halothane and propofol differentially affect electroencephalographic responses to noxious stimulation Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 477 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Sonner, M. Cascio, Y. Xing, M. S. Fanselow, J. E. Kralic, A. L. Morrow, E. R. Korpi, S. Hardy, B. Sloat, E. I. Eger II, et al. {alpha}1 Subunit-Containing GABA Type A Receptors in Forebrain Contribute to the Effect of Inhaled Anesthetics on Conditioned Fear Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 61 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, J. M. Sonner, E. I Eger II, C. R. Stabernack, M. J. Laster, D. E. Raines, and R. A. Harris Gamma-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Do Not Mediate the Immobility Produced by Isoflurane Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 85 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ahrens, G. Haeseler, M. Leuwer, B. Mohammadi, K. Krampfl, R. Dengler, and J. Bufler 2,6 Di-tert-butylphenol, a Nonanesthetic Propofol Analog, Modulates {alpha}1{beta} Glycine Receptor Function in a Manner Distinct from Propofol Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 91 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xing, J. Sonner, M. J. Laster, W. Abaigar, V. B. Caraiscos, B. Orser, and E. I Eger II Insulin Decreases Isoflurane Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration in Rats Independently of an Effect on the Spinal Cord Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1712 - 1717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Butovas and C. Schwarz Spatiotemporal Effects of Microstimulation in Rat Neocortex: A Parametric Study Using Multielectrode Recordings J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3024 - 3039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Sonner, J. F. Antognini, R. C. Dutton, P. Flood, A. T. Gray, R. A. Harris, G. E. Homanics, J. Kendig, B. Orser, D. E. Raines, et al. Inhaled Anesthetics and Immobility: Mechanisms, Mysteries, and Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 718 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|