JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Laster, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sonner, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Laster, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanisms
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;96:706-712
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

GABAA Receptor Blockade Antagonizes the Immobilizing Action of Propofol but Not Ketamine or Isoflurane in a Dose-Related Manner

James M. Sonner, MD, Yi Zhang, MD, Caroline Stabernack, MD, Wella Abaigar, BS, Yilei Xing, MD, and Michael J. Laster, DVM

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco

Address correspondence and reprint requests to James M. Sonner, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Room S-455I, Box 0464, 513 Parnassus Ave., University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0464. Address e-mail to sonnerj{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu

The enhancing action of propofol on {gamma}-amino-n-butyric acid subtype A (GABAA) receptors purportedly underlies its anesthetic effects. However, a recent study found that a GABAA antagonist did not alter the capacity of propofol to depress the righting reflex. We examined whether the noncompetitive GABAA antagonist picrotoxin and the competitive GABAA antagonist gabazine affected a different anesthetic response, immobility in response to a noxious stimulus (a tail clamp in rats), produced by propofol. This effect was compared with that seen with ketamine and isoflurane. Picrotoxin increased the 50% effective dose (ED50) for propofol by approximately 379%; gabazine increased it by 362%, and both antagonists acted in a dose-related manner with no apparent ceiling effect (i.e., no limit). Picrotoxin maximally increased the ED50 for ketamine by approximately 40%–50%, whereas gabazine increased it by 50%–60%. The isoflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration increased by approximately 60% with the picrotoxin and 70% with the gabazine infusion. The ED50 for propofol was also antagonized by strychnine, a non-GABAergic glycine receptor antagonist and convulsant, to determine whether excitation of the central nervous system by a non-GABAergic mechanism could account for the increases in propofol ED50 observed. Because strychnine only increased the immobilizing ED50 of propofol by approximately 50%, GABAA receptor antagonism accounted for the results seen with picrotoxin and gabazine. We conclude that GABAA antagonism can influence the ED50 for immobility of propofol and the non-GABAergic anesthetic ketamine, although to a different degree, reflecting physiologic antagonism for ketamine (i.e., an indirect effect via a modulatory effect on the neural circuitry underlying immobility) versus physiologic and pharmacologic antagonism for propofol (i.e., a direct effect by antagonism of propofol’s mechanism of action). This study also suggests that the immobilizing action of isoflurane probably does not involve the GABAA receptor because antagonism of GABAA receptors for animals anesthetized with isoflurane produces results quantitatively and qualitatively similar to ketamine and markedly different from propofol.

IMPLICATIONS: IV picrotoxin and gabazine antagonized the immobilizing action of propofol in a dose-related manner, whereas antagonism of the immobilizing action of ketamine and isoflurane was similar, smaller than for propofol, and not dose-related. These results are consistent with a role for {gamma}-amino-n-butyric acid subtype A receptors in mediating propofol anesthesia but not ketamine or isoflurane anesthesia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner
Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Yao, J. Kim, R. Atherley, S. L. Jinks, E. Carstens, S. Shargh, A. Sulger, and J. F. Antognini
The Effects of Aromatic Anesthetics on Dorsal Horn Neuronal Responses to Noxious Stimulation
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1759 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Tung, S. Herrera, C. A. Fornal, and B. L. Jacobs
The Effect of Prolonged Anesthesia with Isoflurane, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine, or Ketamine on Neural Cell Proliferation in the Adult Rat
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1772 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Haines, L. M. Mao, L. Yang, A. Arora, E. E. Fibuch, and J. Q. Wang
Modulation of AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit phosphorylation in neurons by the intravenous anaesthetic propofol
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 676 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
F. Jia, M. Yue, D. Chandra, G. E. Homanics, P. A. Goldstein, and N. L. Harrison
Isoflurane Is a Potent Modulator of Extrasynaptic GABAA Receptors in the Thalamus
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1127 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Mourisse, J. Lerou, M. Struys, M. Zwarts, and L. Booij
Multi-level approach to anaesthetic effects produced by sevoflurane or propofol in humans: 2. BIS and tetanic stimulus-induced withdrawal reflex
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 746 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Grasshoff and B. Antkowiak
Effects of isoflurane and enflurane on GABAA and glycine receptors contribute equally to depressant actions on spinal ventral horn neurones in rats
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 687 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Brosnan, D. Gong, J. Cotten, B. Keshavaprasad, C. S. Yost, E. I. Eger II, and J. M. Sonner
Chirality in Anesthesia II: Stereoselective Modulation of Ion Channel Function by Secondary Alcohol Enantiomers.
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J.-H. Sou, M.-H. Chan, and H.-H. Chen
Ketamine, but not propofol, anaesthesia is regulated by metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2006; 96(5): 597 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Chen, S. Shu, and D. A. Bayliss
Suppression of Ih Contributes to Propofol-Induced Inhibition of Mouse Cortical Pyramidal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3872 - 3883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Orth, L. Barter, C. Dominguez, R. Atherley, E. Carstens, and J. F. Antognini
Halothane and propofol differentially affect electroencephalographic responses to noxious stimulation
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. M. Sonner, M. Cascio, Y. Xing, M. S. Fanselow, J. E. Kralic, A. L. Morrow, E. R. Korpi, S. Hardy, B. Sloat, E. I. Eger II, et al.
{alpha}1 Subunit-Containing GABA Type A Receptors in Forebrain Contribute to the Effect of Inhaled Anesthetics on Conditioned Fear
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 61 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Zhang, J. M. Sonner, E. I Eger II, C. R. Stabernack, M. J. Laster, D. E. Raines, and R. A. Harris
Gamma-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors Do Not Mediate the Immobility Produced by Isoflurane
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 85 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Ahrens, G. Haeseler, M. Leuwer, B. Mohammadi, K. Krampfl, R. Dengler, and J. Bufler
2,6 Di-tert-butylphenol, a Nonanesthetic Propofol Analog, Modulates {alpha}1{beta} Glycine Receptor Function in a Manner Distinct from Propofol
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 91 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Xing, J. Sonner, M. J. Laster, W. Abaigar, V. B. Caraiscos, B. Orser, and E. I Eger II
Insulin Decreases Isoflurane Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration in Rats Independently of an Effect on the Spinal Cord
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1712 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Butovas and C. Schwarz
Spatiotemporal Effects of Microstimulation in Rat Neocortex: A Parametric Study Using Multielectrode Recordings
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3024 - 3039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. M. Sonner, J. F. Antognini, R. C. Dutton, P. Flood, A. T. Gray, R. A. Harris, G. E. Homanics, J. Kendig, B. Orser, D. E. Raines, et al.
Inhaled Anesthetics and Immobility: Mechanisms, Mysteries, and Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 718 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.