JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abouleish, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Prough, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abouleish, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Prough, D. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics and Health Care Research

Anesth Analg 2003;96:813-818
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH

Inclusion of Turnover Time Does Not Influence Identification of Surgical Services that Over- and Underutilize Allocated Block Time

Amr E. Abouleish, MD MBA*, Sharon L. Hensley, RN{dagger}, Mark H. Zornow, MD*, and Donald S. Prough, MD*

*Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch; and {dagger}Department of Nursing, John Sealy Hospital, Galveston, Texas

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Amr E. Abouleish, MD, MBA, Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0591. Address e-mail to aaboulei{at}utmb.edu

Allocation of operating room (OR) block time is an ongoing challenge for OR managers. In this study, we sought to determine whether inclusion or exclusion of turnover time in comparisons of block utilization would identify different surgical services as under- or overused. For a 13-mo period, we evaluated data extracted from the OR information system of a large academic medical center. During that time period, 15 surgical services performed 12,245 surgical procedures. Allocated block hours, number of first cases performed, total number of cases, and average case durations were determined. The average turnover time for each service was determined by a manual, case-by-case review of data from 1 mo. Raw utilization (RU; case durations only) and adjusted utilization (AU; case duration plus turnover time) were calculated for each service. Turnover time was credited to the service performing surgery after room turnover. Case du-ration was limited to surgeries performed during resource hours. Two indices of utilization (i.e., the usage rate of the service divided by the overall use of all ORs in the suite) were used to compare services: the RU or AU Index (RUI or AUI). Outliers were services with indices that were >1.15 or <0.85. The RUI identified three services as underutilizers and one service as an overutilizer. Using the AUI, the same outliers were identified, and no new services were identified. Examining the changes in index (between AUI and RUI), the percentage of to-follow cases highly correlated with changes in index (r2 = 0.60); the average turnover time did not (r2 = 0.002). Inclusion of turnover time did not change the services that were identified as under- and overutilizer.

IMPLICATIONS: Turnover time is difficult to determine from existing operating room information systems. This study determined the use of block time with and without turnover time for each surgical service in a large academic hospital. Turnover time did not change identification of surgical services that over- (one service) or underused (three services) allocated block time.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. J. Pandit and F. Dexter
Lack of Sensitivity of Staffing for 8-Hour Sessions to Standard Deviation in Daily Actual Hours of Operating Room Time Used for Surgeons with Long Queues
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2009; 108(6): 1910 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. E. Wachtel and F. Dexter
Tactical Increases in Operating Room Block Time for Capacity Planning Should Not Be Based on Utilization
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 215 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. McIntosh, F. Dexter, and R. H. Epstein
The Impact of Service-Specific Staffing, Case Scheduling, Turnovers, and First-Case Starts on Anesthesia Group and Operating Room Productivity: A Tutorial Using Data from an Australian Hospital
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1499 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Dexter, A. E. Abouleish, R. H. Epstein, C. W. Whitten, and D. A. Lubarsky
Use of Operating Room Information System Data to Predict the Impact of Reducing Turnover Times on Staffing Costs
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1119 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. E. Abouleish, D. S. Prough, C. W. Whitten, and M. H. Zornow
The Effects of Surgical Case Duration and Type of Surgery on Hourly Clinical Productivity of Anesthesiologists
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 833 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. G. Mowbray, A. E. Abouleish, M. H. Zornow, and D. S. Prough
Time Required to Set Up for and Clean Up After a Case Should Be Attributed to the Actual Case in Measuring Turnover Time * Response
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2003; 97(2): 605 - 605.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.