JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watcha, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watcha, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ambulatory
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;96:987-994
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Costs and Effectiveness of Rofecoxib, Celecoxib, and Acetaminophen for Preventing Pain After Ambulatory Otolaryngologic Surgery

Mehernoor F. Watcha, MD*, Tijani Issioui, MD{dagger}, Kevin W. Klein, MD{dagger}, and Paul F. White, PhD MD FANZCA{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Address correspondence to P.F. White, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9068. Address e-mail to paul.white{at}utsouthwestern.edu

We designed this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to compare the analgesic effect of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib with acetaminophen when administered before outpatient otolaryngologic surgery in 240 healthy subjects. Patients were assigned to one of four study groups: Group 1, control (vitamin C 500 mg); Group 2, acetaminophen 2 g; Group 3, celecoxib 200 mg; or Group 4, rofecoxib 50 mg. The first oral dose of the study medication was administered 15–45 min before surgery, and a second dose of the same medication was given on the morning after surgery. Recovery times, side effects, pain scores, and the use of rescue analgesics were recorded. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 24 and 48 h after surgery to assess postdischarge pain, analgesic requirements, nausea, and patient satisfaction with their postoperative pain management and quality of recovery. The need for rescue analgesia and peak pain scores were used as the primary end points for estimating efficacy, and the costs to achieve complete satisfaction with analgesia were used for the cost-efficacy comparisons. Premedication with oral rofecoxib (50 mg) or celecoxib (200 mg) was more effective than placebo in reducing postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements in the postoperative care unit and after discharge. The analgesic efficacy of oral acetaminophen (2 g) was limited to the postdischarge period. Patient satisfaction with pain management was improved in all three treatment groups compared with placebo but was higher with celecoxib and rofecoxib compared with acetaminophen. Rofecoxib was also more effective than celecoxib in reducing pain and improving patient satisfaction after otolaryngologic surgery. Rofecoxib achieved complete satisfaction with pain control in one additional patient, who would not have otherwise been satisfied, at lower incremental costs to the institution compared with celecoxib. We conclude that rofecoxib 50 mg orally is more cost-effective for reducing postoperative pain and improving patient satisfaction with their postoperative pain management than celecoxib (200 mg) or acetaminophen (2 g) in the ambulatory setting.

IMPLICATIONS: Oral premedication with rofecoxib (50 mg) was more effective than celecoxib (200 mg) and acetaminophen (2 g) in reducing postoperative pain and in improving the quality of recovery and patient satisfaction with pain management after outpatient otolaryngologic surgery with only a small increase in cost of care.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Turan, P. F. White, B. Karamanlioglu, D. Memis, M. Tasdogan, Z. Pamukcu, and E. Yavuz
Gabapentin: An Alternative to the Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors for Perioperative Pain Management
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 175 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
The Changing Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Postoperative Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S5 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
Changing Role of COX-2 Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period: Is Parecoxib Really the Answer?
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1306 - 1308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Beaussier, H. Weickmans, C. Paugam, S. Lavazais, J. P. Baechle, P. Goater, A. Buffin, J. F. Loriferne, J. F. Perier, J. P. Didelot, et al.
A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison Between Parecoxib Sodium and Propacetamol for Parenteral Postoperative Analgesia After Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adult Patients
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1309 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. S. Reuben and E. F. Ekman
The Effect of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition on Analgesia and Spinal Fusion
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 536 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. R. Hegi, T. Bombeli, B. Seifert, P. C. Baumann, U. Haller, M. P. Zalunardo, T. Pasch, and D. R. Spahn
Effect of rofecoxib on platelet aggregation and blood loss in gynaecological and breast surgery compared with diclofenac
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2004; 92(4): 523 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Ma, J. Tang, P. F. White, A. Zaentz, R. H. Wender, A. Sloninsky, R. Naruse, R. Kariger, R. Quon, D. Wood, et al.
Perioperative Rofecoxib Improves Early Recovery After Outpatient Herniorrhaphy
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 970 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
Can the Use of Specific Isomers Improve the Safety and Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs?
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2003; 97(2): 309 - 310.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.