JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sumikawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sumikawa, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Monitoring (Cardiac)
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1369-1373
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Hemodynamic Interactions of Propofol and Dantrolene in Chronically Instrumented Dogs

Sungsam Cho, MD, Shiping Zhang, MD, Hiroyuki Ureshino, Tetsuya Hara, MD, Shiro Tomiyasu, MD, and Koji Sumikawa, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sungsam Cho, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan. Address e-mail to chos{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp

The hemodynamic interaction of dantrolene, a specific drug for malignant hyperthermia, and propofol which appears to be safe in malignant hyperthermia-susceptible patients, has not been investigated. We performed this study to examine the hemodynamic actions of dantrolene at a therapeutic dose during propofol anesthesia. Ten dogs were chronically instrumented for the measurements of systemic and coronary hemodynamics. The dogs were assigned to receive propofol with vehicle or dantrolene in a random manner on separate experimental days. Propofol significantly decreased mean arterial blood pressure, left ventricular systolic and end-diastolic pressure, the maximal rate of increase in left ventricular pressure, and left ventricular regional segment shortening. Coronary blood flow (CBF) was unchanged but coronary vascular resistance (CVR) decreased. Dantrolene reversed the decrease in mean arterial blood pressure and left ventricular systolic pressure caused by propofol, and significantly increased heart rate. However, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, cardiac output, maximal rate of increase in left ventricular pressure, and segment shortening were unchanged. CBF was significantly increased with a decrease in CVR. These results suggest that dantrolene reverses the hypotensive action produced by propofol and causes an increase in CBF with a decrease in CVR, but does not significantly change the negative inotropic effects. Thus, dantrolene exerts favorable hemodynamic effects during propofol anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS: Our study suggests that dantrolene reverses the hypotensive action produced by propofol and causes an increase in coronary blood flow with a decrease in coronary vascular resistance, but does not significantly change the negative inotropic effects.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.