JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klasen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hempelmann, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klasen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hempelmann, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1491-1495
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Differing Incidences of Relevant Hypotension with Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia

Joachim Klasen, Dr Med, Axel Junger, Dr Med, Bernd Hartmann, Dr Med, Matthias Benson, Dr Med, Andreas Jost, Anne Banzhaf, Dr Med, Myron Kwapisz, Dr Med, and Gunter Hempelmann, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c.

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Med. Bernd Hartmann, Abt. Anaesthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Str. 7, D-35392 Giessen, Germany. Address e-mail to Bernd.A.Hartmann{at}chiru.med.uni-giessen.de

In this investigation we assessed whether patients receiving spinal anesthesia (SPA) as part of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) more often experience relevant hypotension than patients receiving SPA alone. From January 1, 1997, until August 5, 2000, electronic anesthesia records from 1596 patients having received SPA and 1023 patients having received CSE for elective surgery were collected by using a computerized anesthesia record-keeping system. Relevant hypotension was defined as a decrease of mean arterial blood pressure of more than 30% within a 10-min interval and a therapeutic action of the attending anesthesiologist within 20 min after onset. Electronic patient charts were reviewed by using logistic regression with a forward stepwise algorithm to identify independent risk factors that were associated with an increased incidence of hypotension after CSE. Univariate analysis was performed to assess differences in biometric data and relevant risk factors for hypotension between the two procedures. The incidence of relevant hypotension was more frequent with CSE than with SPA alone (10.9% versus 5.0%; P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, arterial hypertension (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–2.78) and sensory block height >T6 (odds ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–4.22) were found to be factors associated with hypotension in the CSE group. Compared with patients receiving SPA alone, patients undergoing CSE had a significantly more frequent prevalence of arterial hypertension and higher sensory block levels (P < 0.01) despite smaller amounts of local anesthetics. In this study, patients receiving CSE had an increased risk for relevant hypotension as compared with patients with SPA alone. Part of this effect seems to be due to the procedure alone and not only because this population is at higher risk.

IMPLICATIONS: This study, based on a large number of patients with a retrospective design by using on-line recorded data, suggests that spinal anesthesia as part of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia may more often lead to relevant hypotension than spinal anesthesia alone. Preexisting arterial hypertension and a sensory block height exceeding T6 are major risk factors for the development of this complication.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
D. L. Reich and G. W. Fischer
Perioperative Interventions to Modify Risk of Morbidity and Mortality
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2007; 11(3): 224 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. W.-L. Goy, Y. Chee-Seng, A. T.-H. Sia, K. Choo-Kok, and S. Liang
The Median Effective Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Is Larger in the Single-Shot Spinal as Compared with the Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1499 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. W.-L. Goy and A. T.-H. Sia
Sensorimotor Anesthesia and Hypotension After Subarachnoid Block: Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Single-Shot Spinal Technique
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 491 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.