JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horlocker, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horlocker, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, D. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1547-1552
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Small Risk of Serious Neurologic Complications Related to Lumbar Epidural Catheter Placement in Anesthetized Patients

Terese T. Horlocker, MD*, Martin D. Abel, MD*, Joseph M. Messick, Jr, MD*, and Darrell R. Schroeder, MS{dagger}

Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Terese T. Horlocker, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905. Address e-mail to horlocker.terese{at}mayo.edu

Previous studies have identified pain during needle/catheter placement or during the injection of local anesthetic as a risk factor for the development of persistent paresthesias after regional anesthetic techniques. The performance of regional blockade on anesthetized patients theoretically increases the risk of postoperative neurologic complications, because these patients are unable to respond to painful stimuli. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of neurologic complications in 4298 thoracic surgical patients undergoing lumbar epidural catheter placement while under general anesthesia. Catheters were placed immediately after the induction and tracheal intubation or on completion of the surgical procedure, before emergence. Most epidural catheters (4220, or 98.2%) were used solely for postoperative analgesia; only 78 (1.8%) epidural catheters were used for intraoperative anesthesia. In 4239 (98.6%) patients, an opioid alone was administered. The remaining 56 (1.3%) patients received a local anesthetic or local anesthetic/opioid mixture epidurally. Analgesia was graded as excellent or good in 92.2% of patients. Side effects included sedation in 455 (10.6%), nausea or emesis in 328 (7.6%), pruritus in 116 (2.7%), and respiratory depression (pH <=7.3 and PaCO2 >=50 mm Hg) in 308 (7.2%) patients. The mean duration of epidural analgesia was 2.4 ± 0.8 days (range, 0–10.7 days). There were no neurologic complications, including spinal hematoma, epidural abscess or catheter site infections, radicular symptoms, or persistent paresthesias (95% confidence interval, 0%–0.08%). In one patient, the epidural catheter broke during removal, and a portion was retained. The patient was notified; no long-term sequelae were noted. Six patients developed new neurologic symptoms or postoperative worsening of a previous neurologic condition unrelated to epidural catheterization. We conclude that the risk of neurologic complications associated with lumbar epidural catheter placement in anesthetized patients is small. However, the relative risk of this practice, compared with epidural catheter placement in awake patients, is unknown.

IMPLICATIONS: We report no neurologic complications in 4298 patients undergoing epidural catheter placement while under general anesthesia. Although the risk of neurologic complications associated with lumbar epidural catheter placement in anesthetized patients is small, the relative risk compared with epidural catheterization in awake patients is unknown.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Gurnaney, A. Ganesh, and G. Cucchiaro
The Relationship Between Current Intensity for Nerve Stimulation and Success of Peripheral Nerve Blocks Performed in Pediatric Patients Under General Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6): 1605 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Brull, C. J. L. McCartney, V. W. S. Chan, and H. El-Beheiry
Neurological Complications After Regional Anesthesia: Contemporary Estimates of Risk
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 965 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. A. Aldrete
The posterior epidural space is largest at the level of the disc.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 781 - 782.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H.-J. Rapp, A. Folger, and T. Grau
Ultrasound-Guided Epidural Catheter Insertion in Children
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2005; 101(2): 333 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
G. Djaiani, L. Fedorko, and W. S. Beattie
Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 87 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Drasner
Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia: Asleep at the Wheal?
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 578 - 579.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M.-C. Kao, S.-K. Tsai, M.-Y. Tsou, H.-K. Lee, W.-Y. Guo, and J. S. Hu
Paraplegia After Delayed Detection of Inadvertent Spinal Cord Injury During Thoracic Epidural Catheterization in an Anesthetized Elderly Patient
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 580 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. P. Dutton, C. Boehm, R. Shere-Wolfe, M. Hyder, D. Tarantino, M. McCunn, R. W. Rosenquist, and D. J. Birnbach
Epidural Catheter Placement May Also Benefit Intubated and Sedated Patients * Response
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 875 - 876.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Lierz, A. Heinatz, B. Gustorff, P. Felleiter, Y. Gurkan, and K. Toker
Epidural Catheterization in General Anesthesia * Response
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1547 - 1547.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. W. Rosenquist and D. J. Birnbach
Epidural Insertion in Anesthetized Adults: Will Your Patients Thank You?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1545 - 1546.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.