JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, D.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, D.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1589-1597
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

The Contribution of the Coronary Concentrations of Propofol to Its Cardiovascular Effects in Anesthetized Sheep

Da Zheng, MD, Richard N. Upton, PhD, and Allison M. Martinez

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital/University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Da Zheng, MD, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 5005. Address e-mail to da.zheng{at}adelaide.edu.au

Linking physiological pharmacokinetic models to models of the cardiovascular system requires knowledge of the sites in the body that mediate a drug’s cardiovascular effects. We examined the role of the coronary concentrations of propofol. Nine sheep anesthetized with isoflurane (2%) were instrumented acutely for cardiovascular measurements. In a random crossover design, they were administered ramped coronary artery (CA) infusions of propofol to selectively enrich the myocardium (as indicated by the coronary sinus blood concentration) or IV infusions to achieve the same concentration range in all sites of the body. Reductions in left ventricular myocardial contractility (LV dP/dtmax) and mean arterial blood pressure were linearly related to the propofol concentration. For the CA route, LV dP/dtmax was reduced by 52 mm Hg/s for each milligram per liter increase in coronary sinus propofol concentration. For the IV route, the reduction in LV dP/dtmax was equivalent to that with the CA route, showing that the coronary propofol concentration was the major contribution to this effect. For the CA route, mean arterial blood pressure was reduced by 0.6 mm Hg for each milligram per liter. There was a larger reduction (2.5 mm Hg · mg-1 · L-1) for the IV route. Therefore, this effect was predominantly mediated by propofol concentrations elsewhere in the body.

IMPLICATIONS:With use of selective coronary artery infusions in sheep, the coronary concentrations of propofol were shown to be the major contributor to the cardiac depression caused by propofol but were a less significant contributor to the hypotension caused by this drug. Models of the cardiovascular effects of propofol should account for these relationships.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
J. G. Bovill
Intravenous Anesthesia for the Patient with Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2006; 10(1): 43 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.