Anesth Analg 2003;96:1743-1749
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society
CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA
Survival with Full Neurologic Recovery After Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with a Combination of Vasopressin and Epinephrine in Pigs
Karl H. Stadlbauer, MD*,
Horst G. Wagner-Berger, MD*,
Volker Wenzel, MD*,
Wolfgang G. Voelckel, MD*,
Anette C. Krismer, MD*,
Günter Klima, MD ,
Klaus Rheinberger, MSc*,
Sebastian Pechlaner, BS*,
Viktoria D. Mayr, MD*, and
Karl H. Lindner, MD*
Departments of *Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and
Histology, Leopold-Franzens-University, Innsbruck, Austria
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Karl-Heinz Stadlbauer, MD, Leopold-Franzens-University, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Address e-mail to karl-heinz.stadlbauer{at}uibk.ac.at
We sought to determine the effects of a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine on neurologic recovery in comparison with epinephrine alone and saline placebo alone in an established porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After 4 min of cardiac arrest, followed by 3 min of basic life support CPR, 17 animals were randomly assigned to receive, every 5 min, either a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine (vasopressin [IU/kg]/epinephrine [µg/kg]: 0.4/45, 0.4/45, and 0.8/45; n = 6), epinephrine alone (45, 45, and 200 µg/kg; n = 6), or saline placebo alone (n = 5). After 22 min of cardiac arrest, including 18 min of CPR, defibrillation was attempted to achieve the return of spontaneous circulation. Aortic diastolic pressure was significantly (P < 0.01) increased 90 s after each of 3 vasopressin/epinephrine injections versus epinephrine alone versus saline placebo alone (mean ± SEM: 69 ± 3 mm Hg versus 45 ± 3 mm Hg versus 29 ± 2 mm Hg, 63 ± 4 mm Hg versus 27 ± 3 mm Hg versus 23 ± 1 mm Hg, and 52 ± 4 mm Hg versus 21 ± 3 mm Hg versus 16 ± 3 mm Hg, respectively). Spontaneous circulation was restored in six of six vasopressin/epinephrine pigs, whereas six of six epinephrine and five of five saline placebo pigs died (P < 0.01). Neurologic evaluation 24 h after successful resuscitation revealed only an unsteady gait and was normal 5 days after the experiment in all vasopressin/epinephrine-treated animals. In conclusion, in this porcine model of prolonged CPR, repeated vasopressin/epinephrine administration, but not epinephrine or saline placebo alone, ensured long-term survival with full neurologic recovery.
IMPLICATIONS: We present a study to evaluate the effects of a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological outcome in pigs. We found that all pigs treated with a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine could be resuscitated and had full neurologic recovery observed over an entire period of 5 days.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Mentzelopoulos, S. G. Zakynthinos, M. Tzoufi, N. Katsios, A. Papastylianou, S. Gkisioti, A. Stathopoulos, A. Kollintza, E. Stamataki, and C. Roussos
Vasopressin, Epinephrine, and Corticosteroids for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Arch Intern Med,
January 12, 2009;
169(1):
15 - 24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Heath, D. Hanson, R. Long, and N. A. Crowell
Critical Care Providers' Perceptions of the Use of Vasopressin in Cardiac Arrest
Am. J. Crit. Care.,
November 1, 2005;
14(6):
481 - 492.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|