JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beilin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Bodian, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beilin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Bodian, C. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2003;96:1794-1798
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

The Numeric Rating Scale and Labor Epidural Analgesia

Yaakov Beilin, MD*,{dagger}, Sabera Hossain, MS{ddagger}, and Carol A. Bodian, PhD*,{ddagger}

Departments of *Anesthesiology, {dagger}Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, and {ddagger}Biomathematical Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University, New York City

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yaakov Beilin, MD, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Box 1010, One Gustave L. Levy Pl., New York, NY 10029-6574. Address e-mail to yaakov.beilin{at}mountsinai.org

A verbal numeric 0–10 rating scale (NRS) is widely used to evaluate pain in research studies, but its usefulness to the clinician is not well established. In this study, we define desire for additional analgesic medication as a clinically relevant outcome in research studies about pain and compare it with the results of the NRS. A post hoc analysis of three studies that we previously conducted concerning labor epidural analgesia was performed. In all three studies, a verbal NRS score was obtained before and 15 min after labor epidural analgesia. At 15 min, the woman was also asked if she wanted more pain medication. We found that very few patients (2%) with a NRS score of 0–1 wanted more medication. When the NRS score was 2 or 3, 51% of the patients wanted more medication, and when the NRS score was >3, almost all patients (93%) wanted more medication. Grouping the final NRS scores into 3 categories (0 or 1, 2 or 3, and >3) is more useful to the clinician than using individual NRS scores.

IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrated that unless the score of the verbal numeric 0–10 rating scale (NRS) is 0 or 1, most women want more analgesic medication for labor epidural analgesia. Additionally, we found that grouping the NRS values into 3 categories for analysis (0 or 1, 2 or 3, and > 3) is more useful to the clinician than using the full spectrum of NRS scores.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.