JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Orbany, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Salem, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Orbany, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Salem, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;97:80-84
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

The Relationship of Posttetanic Count and Train-of-Four Responses During Recovery from Intense Cisatracurium-Induced Neuromuscular Blockade

Mohammad I. El-Orbany, MD*, Ninos J. Joseph, BS*, and M. Ramez Salem, MD*,{dagger}

Department of Anesthesiology, *Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, and {dagger}University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mohammad I. El-Orbany, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, 836 W. Wellington Ave., Chicago, IL 60657. Address e-mail to mohammad.el-orbany-md{at}advocatehealth.com

Posttetanic count (PTC) has been used to quantify intense degrees of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Our objective in the present investigation was to discern whether PTC correlates with recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade under both inhaled and IV anesthesia. In 60 patients, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 1.5 µg/kg IV. Recovery from intense neuromuscular blockade induced by cisatracurium (0.15 mg/kg) was studied in 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) had anesthesia maintained with propofol 100–200 µg · kg-1 · min-1 and 60% N2O in O2, whereas Group 2 (n = 30) had anesthesia maintained with isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.8%) and 60% N2O in O2. Neuromuscular functions were monitored using acceleromyography. Cycles of posttetanic stimulation were repeated every 6 min with train-of-four (TOF) stimulation in between. Measurement included times to posttetanic responses and to the first response to TOF stimulation (T1), as well as the correlation between PTC and T1. In Group 1, the mean times to PTC1 and T1 were 35.6 ± 7.5 and 46.9 ± 6.5 min, respectively. Corresponding times in Group 2 were 39.5 ± 6.8 and 56.7 ± 5.4 min, respectively. There was a good time correlation, r = 0.919 for propofol (Group 1) and r = 0.779 for isoflurane (Group 2), between PTC and T1 recovery in both groups. The PTC when T1 appeared ranged between 8 and 9 in Group 1 and 8 and 14 in Group 2. Conforming to original observations with other neuromuscular blocking drugs, there is a correlation between PTC and TOF recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade allowing better monitoring of this intense degree of blockade during both IV (propofol) and isoflurane anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS: Monitoring posttetanic count during intense neuromuscular blockade allows the clinician to estimate the intensity of the blockade and estimate recovery time. The relationship between posttetanic count and train-of-four recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was documented under both IV and inhaled anesthesia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Dhonneur, K. Kirov, C. Motamed, R. Amathieu, W. Kamoun, V. Slavov, and S-K. Ndoko
Post-tetanic count at adductor pollicis is a better indicator of early diaphragmatic recovery than train-of-four count at corrugator supercilii
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2007; 99(3): 376 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.