JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shimono, H. Articles by Kanmura, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shimono, H. Articles by Kanmura, Y. Related Collections Complications Pharmacology

---

ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Propofol Displays No Protective Effect Against Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Injury in Rat Liver Slices

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, Kagoshima, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yoshitami Kadota, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, Sakuragaoka 8-35-1, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan. Address e-mail to kadotayo{at}med4.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp

Using precision-cut liver slices (20–25 mg wet weight) from male Wistar rats, we examined whether clinically relevant propofol concentrations have hepatoprotective or -toxic effects during hypoxia/reoxygenation. Slices were preincubated for 2 h in sealed roller vials (three slices per vial) containing Waymouth’s medium (37°C; 95% oxygen/5% CO₂). Then, propofol or Intralipid was added to create four different groups (control, Intralipid, small-concentration propofol [0.5–1.5 µg/mL], and large-concentration propofol [2.0–6.0 µg/mL]). Thereafter, each group was incubated for 4 h under 95% oxygen/5% CO₂ (no hypoxia) or for 2 h under 100% nitrogen plus 2 h under 95% oxygen/5% CO₂ (hypoxia/reoxygenation). Slice viability and hypoxia/reoxygenation injury were assessed at 2, 3, and 4 h after incubation began by using the slice intracellular K⁺ concentration, energy status (adenosine triphosphate content, total adenine nucleotides content, and energy charge), and liver enzyme leakage (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase). Propofol and Intralipid caused a significant delay in energy charge recovery in comparison with the control. There were no significant differences between the propofol groups and the other two groups in intracellular K⁺ content or liver enzyme leakage. Propofol had no hepatotoxic effect under no-hypoxia conditions in rat liver slices, nor did it have a protective effect against hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced hepatic injury.

IMPLICATIONS: Propofol had no hepatotoxic effect under no-hypoxia conditions in rat liver slices, nor did it have a protective effect against hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced hepatic injury.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Zhu, Q. Pang, S. A. McCluskey, and C. Luo Effect of propofol on hepatic blood flow and oxygen balance in rabbits: [L'effet du propofol sur le debit sanguin et l'equilibre d'oxygene hepatiques chez le lapin] Can J Anesth, June 1, 2008; 55(6): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999