JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCluskey, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sayeed, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCluskey, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sayeed, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ambulatory
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;97:713-714
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

The Efficacy of 5% Lidocaine-Prilocaine (EMLA) Cream on Pain During Intravenous Injection of Propofol

A. McCluskey, B. A. Currer, and I. Sayeed

Department of Anesthesia, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, United Kingdom

Address correspondence and reprint requests to A. McCluskey, Department of Anesthesia, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, SK2 7JE, United Kingdom. Address e-mail to amccluskey{at}mcmail.com

Topical anesthesia using 60% lidocaine tape reduces the incidence of propofol injection pain. We conducted a randomized prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled study to assess the analgesic efficacy of pretreatment with topical 5% lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream in 90 ASA physical status I and II adult patients scheduled to undergo day-case gynecological surgery. Propofol injection pain was not reduced by pretreatment with EMLA cream, whereas the addition of lidocaine to propofol did significantly reduce propofol injection pain compared with the control group (P = 0.002). We conclude that topical anesthesia with EMLA cream applied for 60 min does not significantly reduce propofol injection pain.

IMPLICATIONS: Topical local anesthesia with 60% lidocaine tape reduces the incidence of propofol injection pain. However, we found no reduction after pretreatment with topical 5% lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Rochette, A. F. Hocquet, C. Dadure, D. Boufroukh, O. Raux, J. F. Lubrano, S. Bringuier, and X. Capdevila
Avoiding propofol injection pain in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2008; 101(3): 390 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. C. H. Sun, A. Y. C. Wong, and M. G. Irwin
A Comparison of Pain on Intravenous Injection Between Two Preparations of Propofol
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 675 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.