JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kalff, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kalff, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroanesthesia
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)

Anesth Analg 2003;97:863-866
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

Anesthesia Management for Spine Surgery Using Spinal Navigation in Combination with Computed Tomography

Harald G. Fritz, MD*, Dietmar Kuehn, MD*, Nils Haberland, MD{dagger}, and Rolf Kalff, MD PhD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care and {dagger}Neurological Surgery, University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Harald G. Fritz, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, Bachstrasse 18, 07740 Jena, Germany. Address e-mail to Harald.Fritz{at}med.uni-jena.de

The development of a spine surgery using neuronavigation with intraoperative computed tomography (CT) is of benefit to the patient. However, the procedure also has a major impact on anesthesia management. During the procedure, the patient remains in the prone position on the CT examination table and is moved extensively during CT scans. Furthermore, there is inadequate separation between operating field and anesthetic area. Problems encountered during the procedure were patient positioning, limited patient access, long tubing, and therefore the need for adequate monitoring. We report our experience using this approach in 35 patients with spinal fracture, spinal degeneration, and tumor and describe a step-by-step anesthetic management protocol that has been developed as a guideline for use in spinal neuronavigation with intraoperative CT at our center.

IMPLICATIONS: Spine surgery using intraoperative neuronavigation in combination with intraoperative computed tomography is of benefit to the patient. Problems encountered during the procedure were patient positioning, limited patient access, long tubing, and therefore the need for adequate monitoring.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.