Anesth Analg 2003;97:867-872
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society
OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA
Patients with Severe Preeclampsia Experience Less Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery than Healthy Parturients: A Prospective Cohort Comparison
Antoine G. M. Aya, MD PhD,
Roseline Mangin, MD MSc,
Nathalie Vialles, MD,
Jean-Michel Ferrer, MD,
Colette Robert, MD,
Jacques Ripart, MD PhD, and
Jean-Emmanuel de La Coussaye, MD PhD
Division of Anesthesiology, Pain Management, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital, Nîmes, France
Address correspondence to Antoine G. M. Aya, MD, PhD, Fédération Anesthésie-Douleur-Urgences-Réanimation, CHU Gaston Doumergue, 5 rue Hoche, 30029 Nîmes Cedex 04, France. Address e-mail to guy.aya{at}chu-nimes.fr Reprints will not be available from the author.
In this prospective cohort study, we compared the incidence and severity of spinal anesthesia (SA)-associated hypotension in severely preeclamptic (n = 30) versus healthy (n = 30) parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. After the administration of IV fluids, SA was performed with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, sufentanil, and morphine. Blood pressure (BP) was recorded before and at 2-min intervals for 30 min after SA. Clinically significant hypotension was defined as the need for ephedrine (systolic BP decrease to <100 mm Hg in healthy parturients or 30% decrease in mean BP in both groups). Despite receiving a smaller fluid volume (1653 ± 331 mL versus 1895 ± 150 mL; P = 0.005) and a larger bupivacaine dose (10.5 ± 0.9 mg versus 10.0 ± 0.7 mg; P = 0.019), the severely preeclamptic patients had a less frequent incidence of clinically significant hypotension (16.6% versus 53.3%; P = 0.006), which was less severe and required less ephedrine. The risk of hypotension was almost six times less in severely preeclamptic patients (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.050.58; P = 0.006) than that in healthy patients.
IMPLICATIONS: This prospective cohort study shows that the incidence and severity of hypotension are less in severely preeclamptic patients, as compared with healthy parturients, undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. However, larger studies are required to meaningfully document the safety of spinal anesthesia in this setting.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Visalyaputra
Is Ephedrine the Best Vasopressor for Treating Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Patients with Pre-Eclampsia?
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2006;
103(6):
1584 - 1585.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Santos and D. J. Birnbach
Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Severely Preeclamptic Women: Don't Throw Out the Baby with the Bathwater!
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2005;
101(3):
859 - 861.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Visalyaputra, O. Rodanant, W. Somboonviboon, K. Tantivitayatan, S. Thienthong, and W. Saengchote
Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Severe Preeclampsia: A Prospective Randomized, Multicenter Study
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2005;
101(3):
862 - 868.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. M. Aya, N. Vialles, I. Tanoubi, R. Mangin, J.-M. Ferrer, C. Robert, J. Ripart, and J.-E. de La Coussaye
Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension: A Risk Comparison Between Patients with Severe Preeclampsia and Healthy Women Undergoing Preterm Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2005;
101(3):
869 - 875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Lee, R. E. Harding, A. G. M. Aya, N. Vialles, and J. Ripart
Spinal Anesthesia in Severe Preeclampsia * Response
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2004;
98(6):
1813 - 1813.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Santos and D. J. Birnbach
Spinal Anesthesia in the Parturient with Severe Preeclampsia: Time for Reconsideration
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2003;
97(3):
621 - 622.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|