JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urbanek, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kapral, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urbanek, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kapral, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;97:888-892
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Onset Time, Quality of Blockade, and Duration of Three-in-One Blocks with Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine

Bernhard Urbanek, MD, Andreas Duma, Oliver Kimberger, MD, Gudrun Huber, MD, Peter Marhofer, MD, Michael Zimpfer, MD MBA, and Stephan Kapral, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Address correspondence to Bernhard Urbanek, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Vienna General Hospital AKH, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Address e-mail to bernhard.urbanek{at}gmx.at Reprints will not be available from the authors but can be purchased through the journal’s Web site.

Levobupivacaine is the isolated S(-)-stereoisomer of racemic bupivacaine. Important pharmacodynamic properties of levobupivacaine have not been determined for the femoral three-in-one block. In this randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial, we studied 60 ASA physical status I–III patients scheduled for surgery of the lower limb. A nerve-stimulator-guided three-in-one block was performed as supplemental analgesic therapy with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20), levobupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20), or levobupivacaine 0.25% (n = 20). Sensory onset time, quality of blockade, and duration of blockade were assessed by pinprick test in the central sensory innervation region of the femoral nerve (distribution of the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve). A rating scale from 100% (normal sensation) to 0% (no sensation at all) as compared with the contralateral leg was used. No significant difference in sensory onset time among the three local anesthetic solutions was observed (mean [95% confidence interval]): bupivacaine 0.5%, 27 min (20–33 min); levobupivacaine 0.5%, 24 min (18–30 min); and levobupivacaine 0.25%, 30 min (23–36 min) (P = 0.49). The analgesic quality of the blockade was also not significantly different among the three groups, whereas a complete sensory block was achieved in significantly fewer patients in the levobupivacaine 0.25% group (P = 0.02). The duration of blockade was significantly shorter with levobupivacaine 0.25% compared with the other groups: bupivacaine 0.5%, 1053 min (802–1304 min); levobupivacaine 0.5%, 1001 min (844–1158 min); and levobupivacaine 0.25%, 707 min (551–863 min) (P = 0.01). Levobupivacaine 0.5% is recommended instead of bupivacaine 0.5% for the three-in-one block.

IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized, controlled study, we determined important pharmacodynamic variables (onset time, quality of blockade, and duration of blockade) of levobupivacaine 0.5% and 0.25% in the three-in-one block compared with bupivacaine 0.5% by pinprick testing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Sia, F. Pelusio, R. Barbagli, and C. Rivituso
Analgesia Before Performing a Spinal Block in the Sitting Position in Patients with Femoral Shaft Fracture: A Comparison Between Femoral Nerve Block and Intravenous Fentanyl
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1221 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.