JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Picton, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Plourde, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Picton, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Plourde, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)
Right arrow Technology

Anesth Analg 2003;97:1396-1402
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Human Auditory Steady-State Responses: The Effects of Recording Technique and State of Arousal

Terence W. Picton, PhD*, M. Sasha John, PhD*, David W. Purcell, PhD*, and Gilles Plourde, MD{dagger}

*Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Terence W. Picton, PhD, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, 3560 Bathurst St., Toronto, M6A 2E1, Canada. Address e-mail to tpicton{at}rotman-baycrest.on.ca

There is some controversy in the literature about whether auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) can be reliably recorded in all subjects and whether these responses consistently decrease in amplitude during drowsiness. In 10 subjects, 40-Hz ASSRs became significantly different from background electroencephalogram activity with a probability of P < 0.01 and an average time of 22 s (range, 2–92 s), provided that the responses were analyzed with time-domain averaging rather than spectral averaging. In a second experiment with 10 subjects, 40-Hz ASSRs recorded between the vertex and posterior neck consistently decreased in amplitude during drowsiness and sleep. Findings that the ASSR may occasionally increase during drowsiness may be explained by postauricular muscle responses recorded from a mastoid reference. These may occur during drowsiness in association with rolling-eye movements. ASSRs recorded between the vertex and posterior neck are not distorted by these reflexes. These findings combine with previous literature on the effects of general anesthetics on the ASSR to confirm that the ASSR is a valid option for monitoring the hypnotic effects of general anesthetics.

IMPLICATIONS: Auditory steady-state responses to stimuli presented at rates near 40 Hz can be used to monitor anesthesia. These responses can be quickly and reliably recorded during both sleep and wakefulness, provided that appropriate averaging techniques are used.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.