JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rathmell, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Viani, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rathmell, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Viani, B. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2003;97:1452-1457
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


PAIN MEDICINE

Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia: A Randomized, Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

James P. Rathmell, MD, Carlos A. Pino, MD, Richard Taylor, MD, Terri Patrin, RN, and Bruce A. Viani, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont

Address correspondence and reprint requests to James P. Rathmell, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, 111 Colchester Ave., Burlington, VT 05401. Address e-mail to james.rathmell{at}vtmednet.org

In this series, we examined analgesia and side effects of intrathecal morphine sulfate (ITMS) after hip and knee arthroplasty over a dose range of 0.0–0.3 mg. Eighty patients undergoing hip (n = 40) or knee (n = 40) arthroplasty were randomized to receive ITMS (0.0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. Morphine use, pain relief, and side effects were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and linear regression. After hip arthroplasty, morphine use was less in patients receiving 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg of ITMS than in control patients (P < 0.05). After knee arthroplasty, ITMS did not reduce postoperative morphine requirements. Nausea and vomiting and the incidence of oxygen saturation <93% were similar in all groups. Pruritus was more common after ITMS. Patients receiving 0.2 or 0.3 mg of ITMS were more satisfied with their pain control than those receiving 0.0 or 0.1 mg after both hip and knee arthroplasty. Analgesic needs are greater after knee arthroplasty than after hip arthroplasty. We conclude that combining small-dose (0.2 mg) ITMS with PCA morphine provides good to excellent pain control in most patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty. However, PCA morphine use was reduced by the addition of ITMS only after hip arthroplasty.

IMPLICATIONS: This series examined the need for supplemental analgesics, the quality of analgesia, and the incidence of side effects with intrathecal morphine sulfate (ITMS) for analgesia after hip and knee arthroplasty. Analgesic needs are greater after knee arthroplasty than hip arthroplasty. Combining small-dose (0.2 mg) ITMS with standard doses of PCA morphine provided good to excellent pain control in most patients and reduced patient-controlled analgesia morphine use after hip, but not knee, arthroplasty.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
T. T. Horlocker, S. L. Kopp, M. W. Pagnano, and J. R. Hebl
Analgesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a multimodal pathway featuring peripheral nerve block.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2006; 14(3): 126 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. P. Rathmell, T. R. Lair, and B. Nauman
The Role of Intrathecal Drugs in the Treatment of Acute Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S30 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Wallden, S.-E. Thorn, and M. Wattwil
The Delay of Gastric Emptying Induced by Remifentanil Is Not Influenced by Posture
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 429 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.