JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (38) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Williams, S. R. Articles by Girard, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Williams, S. R. Articles by Girard, F. Related Collections Equipment Monitoring (Non-cardiac) Regional Anesthesia

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Ultrasound Guidance Speeds Execution and Improves the Quality of Supraclavicular Block

Stephan R. Williams, MD PhD^*, Philippe Chouinard, MD FRCPC^*, Geneviève Arcand, MD^*, Patrick Harris, MD FRCSC, Monique Ruel, RN^*, Daniel Boudreault, MD FRCPC^*, and François Girard, MD FRCPC^*

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Quebec

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Philippe Chouinard, MD, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesiology, CHUM, Hôpital Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke East, Montreal, PQ, H2L 4M1. Address e-mail to philippe.chouinard.chum{at}ssss.gouv.qc.ca

In this prospective study, we assessed the quality, safety, and execution time of supraclavicular block of the brachial plexus using ultrasonic guidance and neurostimulation compared with a supraclavicular technique that used anatomical landmarks and neurostimulation. It was hypothesized that ultrasonic guidance would increase the proportion of successful blocks, decrease block execution time, and reduce the incidence of complications such as pneumothorax and neuropathy. Eighty patients were randomized into two groups of 40, Group US (supraclavicular block guided in real time by a two-dimensional ultrasonic image, with neurostimulator confirmation of correct needle position) and Group NS (supraclavicular block using the subclavian perivascular approach, also with neurostimulator confirmation). Blocks were performed using bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% (1:1 vol) with epinephrine 1:200,000 as the anesthetic mixture. The onset of motor and sensory block for the musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerves was evaluated over a 30 min period. At 30 min 95% of patients in Group US and 85% of patients in Group NS had a partial or complete sensory block of all nerve territories (P = 0.13) and 55% of patients in Group US and 65% of patients in Group NS had a complete block of all nerve territories (P = 0.25). Surgical anesthesia without supplementation was achieved in 85% of patients in Group US and 78% of patients in Group NS (P = 0.28). No patient in Group US and 8% of patients in Group NS required general anesthesia (P = 0.12). The quality of ulnar block was significantly inferior to the quality of block in other nerve territories in Group NS, but not in Group US; the quality of ulnar block was not significantly different between Groups NS and US. The block was performed in an average of 9.8 min in Group NS and 5.0 min in Group US (P = 0.0001). No major complication occurred in either group. We conclude that ultrasound-guided neurostimulator-confirmed supraclavicular block is more rapidly performed and provides a more complete block than supraclavicular block using anatomic landmarks and neurostimulator confirmation.

IMPLICATIONS: Ultrasound-guided neurostimulator-confirmed supraclavicular block is more rapidly performed and provides a block of better quality than supraclavicular block using anatomic landmarks and neurostimulator confirmation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Q.H. Tran, L. Munoz, G. Russo, and R. J. Finlayson Ultrasonography and stimulating perineural catheters for nerve blocks: a review of the evidence: [L'echographie et les catheters perineuraux stimulants pour les blocs nerveux : une synthese des donnees probantes] Can J Anesth, July 1, 2008; 55(7): 447 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Sauter, M. S. Dodgson, A. Stubhaug, A. M. Halstensen, and O. Klaastad Electrical Nerve Stimulation or Ultrasound Guidance for Lateral Sagittal Infraclavicular Blocks: A Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blinded, Comparative Study Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1910 - 1915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. O'Sullivan Patient Comfort in Regional Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 349 - 349. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. H. De Tran, A. Clemente, J. Doan, and R. J. Finlayson Brachial plexus blocks: a review of approaches and techniques: [Les blocs du plexus brachial : compte-rendu des approches et techniques] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2007; 54(8): 662 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Casati, M. Baciarello, S. D. Cianni, G. Danelli, G. De Marco, S. Leone, M. Rossi, and G. Fanelli Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 823 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Marhofer and V. W. S. Chan Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: Current Concepts and Future Trends Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1265 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Dingemans, S. R. Williams, G. Arcand, P. Chouinard, P. Harris, M. Ruel, and F. Girard Neurostimulation in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Trial Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1275 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tsui Ultrasound-guidance and nerve stimulation: implications for the future practice of regional anesthesia/Echoguidage et neurostimulation : implications pour la pratique future de l'anesthesie regionale Can J Anesth, March 1, 2007; 54(3): 165 - 170. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. W.S. Chan, A. Perlas, C. J.L. McCartney, R. Brull, D. Xu, and S. Abbas Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block: [L'echoguidage ameliore le taux de succes du bloc axillaire du plexus brachial] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2007; 54(3): 176 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Carty and B. Nicholls Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia CEACCP, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 20 - 24. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Lou and B. Tsui 26301 - LEARNING CURVES FOR ULTRASOUND-GUIDED REGIONAL ANESTHESIA Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(suppl_1): 26301 - 26301. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C J C Cash, A M Sardesai, L H Berman, M J Herrick, G M Treece, R W Prager, and A H Gee Spatial mapping of the brachial plexus using three-dimensional ultrasound Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2005; 78(936): 1086 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Arcand, S. R. Williams, P. Chouinard, D. Boudreault, P. Harris, M. Ruel, and F. Girard Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Block Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 886 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Marhofer, M. Greher, and S. Kapral Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 7 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kane, W. Grassi, R. Sturrock, and P. V. Balint Musculoskeletal ultrasound--a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 2: Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology Rheumatology, July 1, 2004; 43(7): 829 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999