| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Address correspondence and reprint requests to William H. Rosenblatt, MD, Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, TMP-3, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510. Address e-mail to will.rosenblatt{at}yale.edu
IMPLICATIONS: Although the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMATM) has become a standard tool in the airway resuscitation armamentarium, lack of access to the gastrointestinal tract can limit its utility. A new LMA (LMA-ProSealTM) overcomes this limitation. In the current case, reducing gastric distension reversed inadequate oxygenation after failed intubation and face mask ventilation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ojeda, A. M. Lopez, X. Borrat, and R. Valero Failed Tracheal Intubation with the LMA-CTrachTM in Two Patients with Lingual Tonsil Hyperplasia Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 601 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Cook, J. P. Nolan, J. Brimacombe, and C. Keller Failed Obstetric Tracheal Intubation and Postoperative Respiratory Support with the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway * Response Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 290 - 291. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Dunn, L. Robbins, N. R. Connelly, and W. H. Rosenblatt The LMA ProSeal TM May Not Be the Best Option for Difficult to Intubate/Ventilate Patients * Response Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 310 - 311. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|