JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Law, A. C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Law, A. C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, M. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2003;97:1795-1799
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

The Effect of Right Versus Left Lateral Decubitus Positions on Induction of Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Alice C. S. Law, MB ChB*, Kwok K. Lam, MB ChB, FANZCA, FHKAM{dagger}, and Michael G. Irwin, MB ChB, FRCA, FHKAM{ddagger}

From the *Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, the {dagger}Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, and the {ddagger}Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. K. K. Lam, Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong. Address email to plam{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the left lateral (LL) decubitus position combined with intraoperative left uterine displacement may result in pooling of local anesthetic onto one side of the body. We studied the effect of the right lateral (RL) and LL decubitus positions during placement of spinal anesthesia on the intrathecal spread of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus fentanyl in 60 term parturients. Though all parturients acquired a loss of cold sensation at T4 15 min after intrathecal injection, more parturients in the LL group than in the RL group did so at 5 min (P < 0.05). The maximum levels of sensory blockades, amounts of fluid, vasopressor, and supplementary analgesia used, and the incidence of postoperative complications were similar. We conclude that the two positions can be used equally well when hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl are used in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS: We conducted a double-blinded randomized trial comparing the spread of spinal anesthesia placed with a parturient in either the right or left lateral position. There was a faster onset in the left lateral group; however, the maximum block heights and the time taken to achieve them were similar in both groups.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. C. Coppejans, E. Hendrickx, J. Goossens, and M. P. Vercauteren
The Sitting Versus Right Lateral Position During Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Block Characteristics and Severity of Hypotension
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 243 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.