JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rusca, M.
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rusca, M.
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)

Anesth Analg 2003;97:1835-1839
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society


GENERAL ARTICLES

Prevention of Atelectasis Formation During Induction of General Anesthesia

Marco Rusca, MD*, Stefania Proietti, MD{dagger}, Pierre Schnyder, MD{dagger}, Philippe Frascarolo, PhD*, Göran Hedenstierna, MD PhD{ddagger}, Donat R. Spahn, MD*, and Lennart Magnusson, MD PhD*

Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; and {ddagger}Department of Clinical Physiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Lennart Magnusson, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier, Universitaire Vaudois, Chuv BH-10, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Address e-mail to Lennart.Magnusson{at}chuv.hospvd.ch

General anesthesia promotes atelectasis formation, which is augmented by administration of large oxygen concentrations. We studied the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application during the induction of general anesthesia (fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] 1.0) to prevent atelectasis. Sixteen adult patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups breathed 100% O2 for 5 min and, after a general anesthesia induction, mechanical ventilation via a face mask with a FIO2 of 1.0 for another 5 min before endotracheal intubation. Patients in the first group (PEEP group) had continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (6 cm H2O) and mechanical ventilation via a face mask with a PEEP of 6 cm H2O. No CPAP or PEEP was applied in the control group. Atelectasis, determined by computed radiograph tomography, and analysis of blood gases were measured twice: before the beginning of anesthesia and directly after the intubation. There was no difference between groups before the anesthesia induction. After endotracheal intubation, patients in the control group showed an increase of the mean area of atelectasis from 0.8% ± 0.9% to 4.1% ± 2.0% (P = 0.0002), whereas the patients of the PEEP group showed no change (0.5% ± 0.6% versus 0.4% ± 0.7%). After the intubation with a FIO2 of 1.0, PaO2 was significantly higher in the PEEP group than in the control (591 ± 54 mm Hg versus 457 ± 99 mm Hg; P = 0.005). Atelectasis formation is prevented by application of PEEP during the anesthesia induction despite the use of large oxygen concentrations, resulting in improved oxygenation.

IMPLICATIONS: Application of positive end-expiratory pressure during the induction of general anesthesia prevents atelectasis formation. Furthermore, it improves oxygenation and probably increases the margin of safety before intubation. Therefore, this technique should be considered for all anesthesia induction, at least in patients at risk of difficult airway management during the anesthesia induction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-M. Delay, M. Sebbane, B. Jung, D. Nocca, D. Verzilli, Y. Pouzeratte, M. E. Kamel, J.-M. Fabre, J.-J. Eledjam, and S. Jaber
The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation to Enhance Preoxygenation in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1707 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. G. Kaditis, E. K. Motoyama, W. Zin, N. Maekawa, I. Nishio, T. Imai, and J. Milic-Emili
The Effect of Lung Expansion and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Respiratory Mechanics in Anesthetized Children
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 775 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. B. Lumb
Just a little oxygen to breathe as you go off to sleep...is it always a good idea?
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2007; 99(6): 769 - 771.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. S. von Ungern-Sternberg, A. Regli, A. Schibler, J. Hammer, F. J. Frei, and T. O. Erb
The Impact of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Functional Residual Capacity and Ventilation Homogeneity Impairment in Anesthetized Children Exposed to High Levels of Inspired Oxygen
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1364 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. Baillard and S. Jaber
Noninvasive Ventilation versus Nonrebreather Bag-Valve Mask to Achieve Preoxygenation before Intubation of Hypoxic Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2006; 174(11): 1274a - 1274a.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Jaber and C. Baillard
The Low-Flow or High-Flow Oxygen Delivery System and a Low-Flow or High-Flow Nonrebreather Mask
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2006; 174(9): 1055b - 1055b.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. Baillard, J.-P. Fosse, M. Sebbane, G. Chanques, F. Vincent, P. Courouble, Y. Cohen, J.-J. Eledjam, F. Adnet, and S. Jaber
Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Preoxygenation before Intubation of Hypoxic Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 171 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Yu, K. Yang, A. B. Baker, and I. Young
The effect of bi-level positive airway pressure mechanical ventilation on gas exchange during general anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2006; 96(4): 522 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
V. Squadrone, M. Coha, E. Cerutti, M. M. Schellino, P. Biolino, P. Occella, G. Belloni, G. Vilianis, G. Fiore, F. Cavallo, et al.
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Postoperative Hypoxemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, February 2, 2005; 293(5): 589 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Gander, P. Frascarolo, M. Suter, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia Increases Duration of Nonhypoxic Apnea in Morbidly Obese Patients
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 580 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2003 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.