JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szpisjak, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Capehart, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szpisjak, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Capehart, B. P.

Anesth Analg 2004;98:201-205
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society


TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION

Economic Analysis of an Intraoperative Cell Salvage Service

Dale F. Szpisjak, MD*,{dagger}, Paul S. Potter, MD{ddagger}, and Bruce P. Capehart, MD, MBA§

*Anesthesia Department, Naval Hospital Rota, Spain; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Dunlap Memorial Hospital, Orrville, Ohio; and §Federal Medical Center, Butner, North Carolina

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dale F. Szpisjak, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814. Address e-mail to dszpisjak{at}usuhs.mil

In the United States, the cost of erythrocyte transfusion exceeds 1.3 billion dollars annually. The fear of viral disease transmission popularized intraoperative salvage to reduce the use of banked blood. Although the economics of this technique have been questioned, the financial variables in providing an intraoperative autotransfusion service have not been analyzed. We designed mathematical models to determine the most cost-effective strategy based on hospital caseload. Four models were analyzed with a spreadsheet to project costs of an intraoperative autotransfusion service when fully or partially outsourced, performed by a full-time technician employee, or performed by a cross-trained employee. The Partially Outsourced model was more economical than the Fully Outsourced model when the annual caseload exceeded 185 cases. The New Employee model became more economical than the Fully Outsourced model when the annual caseload exceeded 110 cases. The Cross-Trained model was the most economical when annual caseload exceeded 55 cases.

IMPLICATIONS: Cross-training an employee as a cell salvage technician is more economical than outsourcing when caseload exceeds 55 per year.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. R. Waters, H. H. Meier, and J. H. Waters
An Economic Analysis of Costs Associated with Development of a Cell Salvage Program
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 869 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.