JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.

Anesth Analg 2004;98:95-101
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: The Effect of Added Dextrose

Daniel T. Warren, MD, and Dan J. Kopacz, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Address correspondence to Dr. Kopacz, Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Clinic, 1100 Ninth Avenue, B2-AN, PO Box 900, Seattle, WA 98111. Address email to anedjk{at}vmmc.org

Spinal 2-chloroprocaine is being investigated as an alternative short-acting spinal anesthetic to replace lidocaine for outpatient surgery. Adding dextrose increases the baricity of solutions and alters the characteristics of spinal anesthesia. In this study, we compared 2-chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia performed with or without the addition of dextrose (1.1%). Eight volunteers underwent 2 spinal anesthetics, receiving 40 mg 2-chloroprocaine (2 mL, 2%) with 0.25 mL saline with one and 0.25 mL 10% dextrose with the other in a double-blinded, randomized, balanced crossover manner. Pinprick anesthesia, tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and tourniquet, motor strength measurements, and time to ambulation and void were assessed. Postvoid residual bladder volume was measured via ultrasound. Spinal anesthesia was successful in all subjects and regressed within 110 (80–110) min. There was no significant difference in peak height T4 (T7-C6), time to achieve peak block height (14 ± 6 min), time for 2-segment regression (44 ± 9 min), regression to L1 (66 ± 12 min), tolerance of tourniquet (43 ± 9 min), or return of motor function (81 ± 14 min). Mean postvoid residual volume was larger with dextrose (74 ± 67 mL versus 16 ± 35 mL; P = 0.02). No subject reported signs of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS). In conclusion, spinal 2-chloroprocaine provides adequate potency with reliable regression, seemingly without TNS. Adding dextrose does not significantly alter spinal block characteristics but increases residual bladder dysfunction. Therefore, the addition of glucose to 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia is not necessary.

IMPLICATIONS: Spinal chloroprocaine provides adequate potency with reliable regression, seemingly without concerns of transient neurologic symptoms, and hence an appealing profile for outpatient surgery. The addition of dextrose does not alter peak block height or tolerance of thigh tourniquet, and increases the degree of residual bladder dysfunction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Drasner
Chloroprocaine Spinal Anesthesia: Back to the Future?
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 549 - 552.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. R. Yoos and D. J. Kopacz
Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine for Surgery: An Initial 10-Month Experience
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 553 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. R. Yoos and D. J. Kopacz
Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: A Comparison with Small-Dose Bupivacaine in Volunteers
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 566 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.