JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Senard, M. Articles by Joris, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Senard, M. Articles by Joris, J. L. Related Collections Regional Anesthesia Pain Pharmacology

---

PAIN MEDICINE

Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery

Marc Senard, MD^*, Abdourhamane Kaba, MD^*, Murielle J. Jacquemin, MD^*, Luc M. Maquoi, MD^*, Marie-Pierre N. Geortay, MD^*, Pierre D. Honoré, MD, Maurice L. Lamy, MD^*, and Jean L. Joris, MD PhD^*

*Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine and Service of Abdominal Surgery, CHU de Liège, Belgium

Address correspondence to Dr. Jean Joris, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liège, Belgium. Address e-mail to jean.joris{at}chu.ulg.ac.be

Ropivacaine appears attractive for epidural analgesia because it produces less motor block than racemic bupivacaine. The potential benefits of levobupivacaine with regard to motor blockade require further investigations. In this study, we compared the efficacy, dose requirements, side effects, and motor block observed with epidural levobupivacaine and ropivacaine when given in combination with small-dose morphine for 60 h after major abdominal surgery. Postoperatively, 50 patients were randomly allocated, in a double-blinded manner, to patient-controlled epidural analgesia with the same settings and without basal infusion, using 0.1% levobupivacaine or 0.1% ropivacaine. Both were combined with an epidural infusion of 0.1 mg/h morphine. Pain scores, side effects, motor block, and local anesthetic consumption were measured for 60 h. Pain scores measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale were approximately 20 mm at rest and 40 mm during mobilization in both groups. Bromage scores were 1 for all patients after the fourth postoperative hour. Consumption of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine were similar: 344 ± 178 mg levobupivacaine versus 347 ± 199 mg ropivacaine 48 h postoperatively. On postoperative day 2, 19 patients in the ropivacaine group versus 12 in the levobupivacaine group were able to ambulate (P < 0.05). No difference was noted concerning incidence of side effects. We conclude that when used as patient-controlled epidural analgesia and combined with small-dose epidural morphine, 0.1% levobupivacaine and 0.1% ropivacaine produce comparable postoperative analgesia with a similar incidence of side effects.

IMPLICATIONS: Small concentrations (0.1%) of epidural levobupivacaine and ropivacaine combined with morphine (0.1 mg/h) produce comparable analgesia and have similar side effects for similar dose requirements.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Smet, E. Vlaminck, and M. Vercauteren Randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after orthopaedic surgery with sufentanil and ropivacaine 0.165% or levobupivacaine 0.125% Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 99 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Tran, T. J. Ganley, L. Wells, A. Ganesh, K. I. Minger, and G. Cucchiaro Intraarticular Bupivacaine-Clonidine-Morphine Versus Femoral-Sciatic Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1304 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999