JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M.
Right arrow Articles by Standl, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, M.
Right arrow Articles by Standl, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics and Health Care Research
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pain

Anesth Analg 2004;98:708-713
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000096040.02725.74

PAIN MEDICINE

Cost Drivers in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Major Surgery

Martin Schuster, MD, MA, André Gottschalk, MD, Marc Freitag, MD, and Thomas Standl, MD Section Editor

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Martin Schuster, MD, MA, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Address e-mail to m.schuster{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

In this retrospective study, we determined efficiency, treatment length, and resource use for postoperative pain management with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in 350 consecutive patients undergoing major abdominal, thoracic, gynecological, or orthopedic surgery. Average pain scores on a visual analog scale were 16 ± 23 and 9 ± 16 (visual analog scale range, 0 to 100) on postoperative Days 1 and 3, respectively, and were similar among groups. The treatment length was 4.9 ± 2.2 days in general surgical, 5.2 ± 3.1 days in gynecological, and 4.5 ± 2.8 days in orthopedic patients. The total volumes of the mixture of local anesthetic and opioid received epidurally were 707 ± 507 mL, 770 ± 576 mL, and 593 ± 456 mL in the general surgical, gynecological, and orthopedic groups, respectively. The average total costs for all groups for the full treatment course with PCEA were

447 ±

218 per case (

1 equals approximately US$1). Fifty-one percent of these costs were staff costs, 20% were costs for the applied drugs, 15% were costs for PCEA pumps and pump material, and 13% were costs for the initial catheter insertion. In the light of these costs and the availability of less costly alternatives, measurements for cost containment by using PCEA are recommended. Because treatment length is the main cost driver both for drug and staff costs, close monitoring of treatment length and a predefined migration path to alternative techniques after PCEA should be considered.

IMPLICATIONS: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia is increasingly used as first-line treatment for postoperative pain management. In this study, costs and cost drivers are analyzed for the first time for this new technique, based on 350 cases of pain therapy after major surgery in a university hospital.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
F. Bonnet and E. Marret
Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2005; 95(1): 52 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Schuster, T. Standl, H. Reissmann, L. Kuntz, and J. S. am Esch
Reduction of Anesthesia Process Times After the Introduction of an Internal Transfer Pricing System for Anesthesia Services
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. I. Fernandez, A. E. Martin-Ucar, H.D. Lee, K. J. West, R. Wyatt, and D. A. Waller
Does a thoracic epidural confer any additional benefit following video-assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 671 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Schuster, A. Gottschalk, J. Berger, and T. Standl
A Retrospective Comparison of Costs for Regional and General Anesthesia Techniques
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 786 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.