JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Groban, L. Articles by Butterworth, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Groban, L. Articles by Butterworth, J. Related Collections Cardiovascular Heart Pain

---

CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Intrathecal Morphine Reduces Infarct Size in a Rat Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Leanne Groban, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157–1009. Address email to lgroban{at}wfubmc.edu

Systemically-administered morphine reduces infarct size in rat models of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. We sought to determine whether much smaller doses of spinally-administered morphine offer a similar cardioprotective benefit. Barbiturate-anesthetized, open-chested, Wistar rats with chronic indwelling thoracic intrathecal catheters were instrumented for hemodynamic measurements and subjected to 30 min of coronary occlusion and 90 min of reperfusion. Myocardial infarct size was determined using triphenyl-tetrazolium staining. Rats were randomly assigned to receive intrathecal (IT) 0.9% saline (vehicle), IV morphine (0.3 mg/kg) plus IT saline, small-dose IT morphine (0.3 µg/kg), or large-dose IT morphine (3 µg/kg) 20 min before occlusion. IV and both doses of IT morphine reduced infarct size, defined as area of necrosis expressed as a percentage of area at risk (%AN/AAR), as compared with vehicle. The %AN/AAR group means were as follows: IV (n = 7), 30% ± 6%; IT_small-dose (n = 9), 30% ± 5%; IT_large-dose (n = 9), 18% ± 4%; and vehicle (n = 10), 47% ± 5%. There were no significant differences in infarct size among the morphine-pretreated rats. During ischemia-reperfusion, heart rate was unchanged from baseline in the IT_large-dose group, whereas in the IT_small-dose, IV and vehicle groups, significant declines in heart rate occurred. Changes in arterial blood pressure were similar among groups. These results indicate that IT morphine reduces infarct size in rats, and this benefit is as great as that provided by IV morphine administration.

IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that spinally-administered morphine provides a previously unrecognized cardioprotective benefit. In anesthetized rats subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury, we show that very small doses of intrathecal morphine reduce infarct size in rats, and this benefit is as great as that provided by much larger doses of IV morphine.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Li, G. T. C. Wong, T. M. Wong, Y. Zhang, Z. Xia, and M. G. Irwin Intrathecal Morphine Preconditioning Induces Cardioprotection via Activation of Delta, Kappa, and Mu Opioid Receptors in Rats Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2009; 108(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Lessa and E. Tibirica Pharmacologic Evidence for the Involvement of Central and Peripheral Opioid Receptors in the Cardioprotective Effects of Fentanyl Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 815 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Djaiani, L. Fedorko, and W. S. Beattie Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 87 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999