This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Oostrom, J. H. Articles by Melker, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Oostrom, J. H. Articles by Melker, R. J. Related Collections Equipment Monitoring (Non-cardiac)

---

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Comparative Testing of Pulse Oximeter Probes

Johannes H. van Oostrom, PhD^*,,, and Richard J. Melker, MD PhD^*,,

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, College of Medicine, the Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, and the McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Johannes H. van Oostrom, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL 32610-0254. Address e-mail to hans{at}anest.ufl.edu

The testing of pulse oximeter probes is generally limited to the integrity of the electrical circuit and does not include the optical properties of the probes. Few pulse oximeter testers evaluate the accuracy of both the monitor and the probe. We designed a study to compare the accuracy of nonproprietary probes (OSS Medical) designed for use with Nellcor, Datex-Ohmeda, and Criticare pulse oximeter monitors with that of their corresponding proprietary probes by using a commercial off-the-shelf pulse oximeter tester (Index). The Index pulse oximeter tester does include testing of the optical properties of the pulse oximeter probes. The pulse oximeter tester was given a controlled input that simulated acute apnea. Desaturation curves were automatically recorded from the pulse oximeter monitors with a data-collection computer. Comparisons between equivalent proprietary and nonproprietary probes were performed. Data were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate general linear model analysis. Five OSS Medical probe models were statistically better than the equivalent proprietary probes. The remainder of the probes were statistically similar. Comparative and simulation studies can have significant advantages over human studies because they are cost-effective, evaluate equipment in a clinically relevant scenario, and pose no risk to patients, but they are limited by the realism of the simulation.

IMPLICATIONS: We studied the performance of pulse oximeter probes in a simulated environment. Our results show significant differences between some probes that affect the accuracy of measurement.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Zafar, I. Ayappa, R. G. Norman, A. C. Krieger, J. A. Walsleben, and D. M. Rapoport Choice of Oximeter Affects Apnea-Hypopnea Index Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 80 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Mannheimer, P. B. Batchelder, M. Larsen, H. Gehring, E. Konecny, J. H. van Oostrom, and R. J. Melker The Use of Pulse Oximeter Functional Testers in Evaluating SpO2 Accuracy * Response Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1871 - 1871. [Full Text] [PDF]