| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens-University, Innsbruck, Austria
Address correspondence to Viktoria Mayr, MD, Leopold-Franzens-University, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Address e-mail to viktoria.mayr{at}uibk.ac.at Address reprint requests to Hans-Ulrich Strohmenger, MD, Leopold-Franzens-University, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
In a porcine model, we compared the efficacy of epinephrine, vasopressin, or the combination of epinephrine and vasopressin with that of saline placebo on the survival rate after bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest. After the administration of 5 mg/kg of a 0.5% bupivacaine solution IV, ventilation was interrupted for 3 ± 1 min (mean ± SD) until asystole occurred. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated after 1 min of cardiac arrest. After 2 min of CPR, 28 animals received, every 5 min, epinephrine; vasopressin; epinephrine combined with vasopressin; or placebo IV. Three minutes after each drug administration, up to 3 countershocks (3, 4, and 6 J/kg) were administered; all subsequent shocks were 6 J/kg. Blood was drawn throughout the experiment for the determination of plasma bupivacaine concentration. In the vasopressin/epinephrine combination group, all pigs survived (P < 0.01 versus placebo); in the vasopressin group 5 of 7, in the epinephrine group 4 of 7, and in the placebo group none of 7 swine survived. The plasma concentration of total bupivacaine showed no significant difference among groups. In this model of bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest, CPR with a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in significantly better survival rates than in the placebo group.
IMPLICATIONS: Although cardiovascular collapse occurs mostly immediately after rapid injection of a local anesthetic in the presence of anesthesiologists, resuscitation may be difficult, and the outcome is usually poor. In this model of bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in significantly better survival rates than in the placebo group.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. D. Mayr, L. Mitterschiffthaler, A. Neurauter, C. Gritsch, V. Wenzel, T. Muller, G. Luckner, K. H. Lindner, and H.-U. Strohmenger A Comparison of the Combination of Epinephrine and Vasopressin with Lipid Emulsion in a Porcine Model of Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest After Intravenous Injection of Bupivacaine Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1566 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Weinberg, P. Hertz, J. Newman, V. D. Mayr, C. Raedler, V. Wenzel, K. H. Lindner, and H.-U. Strohmenger Lipid, Not Propofol, Treats Bupivacaine Overdose * Response Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1875 - 1876. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|