Anesth Analg 2004;98:1528-1535
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000120086.35289.9D
PAIN MEDICINE
Safety of Continuous Intrathecal Midazolam Infusion in the Sheep Model
Mary J. Johansen, PharmD*,
Tamara Lee Gradert, BS ,
William C. Satterfield, DVM ,
Wallace B. Baze, DVM, PhD ,
Keith Hildebrand, PhD ,
Lawrence Trissel, BS||, and
Samuel J. Hassenbusch, MD, PhD
Departments of *Experimental Therapeutics,
Neurosurgery, and
Veterinary Sciences and
||Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mary J. Johansen, PharmD, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 601, Houston, TX 77054. Address e-mail to mjohanse{at}mdanderson.org
We investigated the safety of midazolam administered by continuous intrathecal infusion in relevant animal models. Preservative-free midazolam was delivered to sheep and pigs by using implanted infusion systems (SynchroMed® pumps plus silicone catheters). Sheep received midazolam 5 mg/d (n = 4) or 15 mg/d (n = 7) or saline (n = 2) for 43 days at 125 µL/h. One sheep received 10 mg/d. Infusion concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 2.5 mg/mL (5 mg/d) and from 2.5 to 5.0 mg/mL (15 mg/d). Pigs were evaluated for toxicity only and received 15 mg/d (n = 2) or saline (n = 1) for 43 days at 125 µL/h. Behavior, neurologic function, and vital signs were documented. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid chemistry and cytology were evaluated, and histology was performed on spinal cord tissue. Behavior and neurologic function remained normal in all subjects. Gross and microscopic evaluation of spinal tissue revealed mild inflammation surrounding the catheter tract in both the midazolam-treated and the saline-treated groups. This inflammation was likely attributable to the mechanical presence of the catheter. These data demonstrate that continuous intrathecal infusion of preservative-free midazolam at doses up to 15 mg/d were well tolerated.
IMPLICATIONS: We investigated the toxicity of preservative-free intrathecal midazolam delivered continuously via implanted infusion systems in sheep and pigs. Doses of 515 mg/d were well tolerated. The lack of neurotoxicity observed suggests that intrathecal midazolam may be an alternative for the treatment of intractable pain that is unresponsive to opioids.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Rathmell, T. R. Lair, and B. Nauman
The Role of Intrathecal Drugs in the Treatment of Acute Pain
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2005;
101(5S_Suppl):
S30 - 43.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Lin
More on the Dilemma of Intrathecal Midazolam
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2005;
100(2):
604 - 604.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Van Norman, S. K. Palmer, and S. H. Jackson
The Ethical Role of Medical Journal Editors
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2005;
100(2):
603 - 604.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Cousins and R. D. Miller
Intrathecal Midazolam: An Ethical Editorial Dilemma
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2004;
98(6):
1507 - 1508.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Yaksh and J. W. Allen
Preclinical Insights into the Implementation of Intrathecal Midazolam: A Cautionary Tale
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2004;
98(6):
1509 - 1511.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Yaksh and J. W. Allen
The Use of Intrathecal Midazolam in Humans: A Case Study of Process
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2004;
98(6):
1536 - 1545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|