JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Camorcia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Columb, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Camorcia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Columb, M. O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2004;98:1779-1782
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000117147.56528.33

OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

The Relative Motor Blocking Potencies of Intrathecal Ropivacaine: Effects of Concentration

Michela Camorcia, MD*, Giorgio Capogna, MD*, Gordon Lyons, FRCA{dagger}, and Malachy O. Columb, FRCA{ddagger}

*Department of Obstetric Anesthesia, Città di Roma Hospital, Italy; {dagger}Department of Anaesthesia, St James’ University Hospital, Leeds; {ddagger}Consultant in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, South Manchester University Hospital, Wythenshawe, United Kingdom

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Michela Camorcia, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Città di Roma Hospital, Via Maidalchini 20, 00152 Roma, Italy. Address e-mail to michela_camorcia{at}yahoo.it or dipartimento.anestesia@gruppogarofalo.com.

This study established the median effective dose (ED50) for motor block of intrathecal 1% and 0.1% ropivacaine and determined the effects of the concentration of the solution injected on the motor block obtained. We enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double-blind, sequential allocation study 54 parturients undergoing elective Cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural technique. Parturients were randomized to receive intrathecal ropivacaine either 1% or 0.1%. The initial dose was chosen to be 4 mg, with subsequent doses being determined by the response of the previous patient (testing interval, 1 mg). The occurrence of any motor block in either lower limb within 5 min from the intrathecal injection of the study solution was considered effective. The motor block at 5 min was 6.1 mg for 1% ropivacaine (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1–7.1) and was 9.1 mg (95% CI, 7.8–10.3) for 0.1% ropivacaine (P = 0.0013; 95% CI difference, 1.3–4.7). The relative efficacy ratio of the 2 concentrations was 1.5 (95% CI difference, 1.2–1.9) in favor of the larger concentration. The ED50 of spinal ropivacaine to produce motor block in pregnant patients was significantly influenced by the concentration of the local anesthetic, with dose requirements being increased by 50% for the smaller concentration.

IMPLICATIONS: The minimum local anesthetic dose for motor block with 0.1% ropivacaine is 50% larger than the 1% concentration with a relative efficacy ratio of 1.5. Our findings suggest that more diluted local anesthetic solutions determine less motor block, and this may be considered in ambulant laboring parturients.






Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.