JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Toyooka, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Toyooka, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology
Right arrow Airway

Anesth Analg 2004;99:113-116
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000116927.80080.1E


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

The Recovery Profile of Reduced Diaphragmatic Contractility Induced by Propofol in Dogs

Yoshitaka Fujii, MD, Aki Uemura, MD, and Hidenori Toyooka, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yoshitaka Fujii, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Clinical Medicine, 2–1–1, Amakubo, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305–8576, Japan. Address email to yfujii{at}md.tsukuba.ac.jp

Propofol decreases contractility of the diaphragm, but no data are available for its effects on recovery. We studied the recovery profile of reduced diaphragmatic contractility induced by propofol in dogs. Animals were divided into 4 groups of 7 each. Group I, without fatigue, received only maintenance fluid; Group II, without fatigue, was infused with propofol; Group III, with fatigue, received no study drug; Group IV, with fatigue, was infused propofol. Propofol at an anesthetic dose (0.1 mg/kg initial dose plus 6.0 mg · kg–1 · h–1) was administered for 60 min. In Groups III and IV, diaphragmatic fatigue was induced by intermittent supramaximal bilateral electrophrenic stimulation at 20-Hz for 30 min. We assessed diaphragmatic contractility by transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). In group II, Pdi at low-frequency (20-Hz) stimulation decreased to less than baseline (P < 0.05), whereas there was no change in Pdi at high-frequency (100-Hz) stimulation. At 10 min after the end of propofol administration, Pdi at 20-Hz stimulation returned to baseline. When fatigue was established, in Groups III and IV, Pdi at 20-Hz stimulation decreased to less than baseline (P < 0.05), whereas Pdi at 100-Hz stimulation did not change. After administering propofol in Group IV, Pdi at 20-Hz stimulation decreased from fatigued values (P < 0.05). At 20 min after the end of propofol administration, Pdi at 20-Hz stimulation returned to fatigued values. We conclude that reduced contractility in nonfatigued and fatigued canine diaphragm induced by propofol recovers within 20 min after the cessation of administration.

IMPLICATIONS: Propofol at an anesthetic dose decreases diaphragmatic contractility in dogs, and its recovery is established within 20 min after the cessation of administration. This rapid recovery profile for diaphragm muscle dysfunction is widely accepted in anesthetic practice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Fujii and A. Uemura
The Effects of Different Dobutamine Infusion Rates on Hypercapnic Depression of Diaphragmatic Contractility in Pentobarbital-Anesthetized Dogs
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1379 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.