| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||




*Obstetric Anesthesia Unit,
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Epidemiology Unit, and
||Department of Anesthesia, The Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; and
Outcomes ResearchTM Institute and Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tiberiu Ezri, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, 58100, Israel. Address e-mail to tezri{at}netvision.net.il
The ideal technique for identifying the epidural space remains unclear. Five-hundred-forty-seven women in labor who requested epidural analgesia were randomly allocated to three groups according to the technique by which the epidural space was identified: 1) loss-of-resistance with air (air; n = 180), 2) loss-of-resistance with lidocaine (lidocaine; n = 185), and 3) loss-of-resistance with both air and lidocaine (air-plus-lidocaine; n = 182). We assessed ease of epidural catheter insertion, characteristics of the blockade, quality of analgesia, and complications. The inability to thread the epidural catheter occurred in 16% of the air, 4% of the lidocaine, and 3% of the air-plus-lidocaine patients (P < 0.001). More patients from the air group had unblocked segments (6.6% versus 3.2% and 2.2%, respectively; P < 0.02). The incidence of accidental dural puncture was greater in the air group (1.7% versus 0% in the other two groups; P < 0.02). Pain scores, time to onset of analgesia, upper sensory level, motor blockade, and the incidence of hypotension, transient neurological deficits, postpartum urinary retention, and postdural puncture headache were comparable. Identification of the epidural space with air was more difficult and caused more dural punctures than with lidocaine or air plus lidocaine. Additionally, sequential use of air and lidocaine had no advantage over lidocaine alone.
IMPLICATIONS: In laboring women receiving epidural analgesia, identifying the epidural space by loss-of-resistance with lidocaine was more effective and caused fewer complications than identifying the epidural space by loss of resistance with air.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F van Kooten, R Oedit, S L M Bakker, and D W J Dippel Epidural blood patch in post dural puncture headache: a randomised, observer-blind, controlled clinical trial J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 79(5): 553 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Riley and B. Carvalho The EpisureTM Syringe: A Novel Loss of Resistance Syringe for Locating the Epidural Space Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1164 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Evron, V. Gladkov, D. I. Sessler, V. Khazin, O. Sadan, M. Boaz, and T. Ezri Predistention of the Epidural Space Before Catheter Insertion Reduces the Incidence of Intravascular Epidural Catheter Insertion Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 460 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Halpern and P. Angle Identification of the Epidural Space Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2005; 100(4): 1218 - 1218. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|