Anesth Analg 2004;99:77-81
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000120161.30788.04
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
A Randomized Comparison of a Multimodal Management Strategy Versus Combination Antiemetics for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Ashraf S. Habib, MBBCh MSc, FRCA*,
William D. White, MPH*,
Steve Eubanks, MD ,
Theodore N. Pappas, MD , and
Tong J. Gan, MB FRCA, FFARCS(I)*
Departments of *Anesthesiology and
Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tong J. Gan, MB, FRCA, FFARCS(I), Department of Anesthesiology, Box 3094, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to Gan00001{at}mc.duke.edu
A multimodal management strategy for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) appears to be superior to single-drug prophylaxis. We tested the hypothesis that a multimodal PONV prophylaxis regimen incorporating total IV anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and a combination of ondansetron and droperidol is more effective than a combination of these antiemetics in the presence of an inhaled anesthetic. Ninety patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to one of three groups. Group 1 (multimodal group) received TIVA with propofol, droperidol, and ondansetron. Group 2 (combination group) received droperidol and ondansetron with isoflurane and nitrous oxide for the maintenance of anesthesia. Group 3 (TIVA group) received propofol for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The complete response rate (no PONV and no rescue antiemetic) at 2 h after surgery was 90%, 63%, and 66% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.05, Group 1 versus Group 2). At 24 h, the complete response rate was 80%, 63%, and 43% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.05, Group 1 versus Group 3). Patient satisfaction was also greater in the multimodal group than in the other two groups in the postanesthesia care unit (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the multimodal management strategy for PONV was associated with a higher complete response rate and greater patient satisfaction when compared with similar antiemetic prophylaxis with inhaled anesthesia or TIVA with propofol.
IMPLICATIONS: A multimodal management strategy for postoperative nausea and vomiting was superior to combination antiemetic prophylaxis with inhaled anesthetic or total IV anesthesia with propofol.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Leslie, P. S. Myles, M. T. V. Chan, M. J. Paech, P. Peyton, A. Forbes, D. McKenzie, and the ENIGMA Trial Group
Risk factors for severe postoperative nausea and vomiting in a randomized trial of nitrous oxide-based vs nitrous oxide-free anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth.,
October 1, 2008;
101(4):
498 - 505.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. F. White, O. Sacan, N. Nuangchamnong, T. Sun, and M. R. Eng
The Relationship Between Patient Risk Factors and Early Versus Late Postoperative Emetic Symptoms
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2008;
107(2):
459 - 463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Cheng, J. Yeh, and P. Flood
Anesthesia Matters: Patients Anesthetized with Propofol Have Less Postoperative Pain than Those Anesthetized with Isoflurane
Anesth. Analg.,
January 1, 2008;
106(1):
264 - 269.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. White, R. J. Black, M. Jones, and G. C. Mar Fan
Randomized comparison of two anti-emetic strategies in high-risk patients undergoing day-case gynaecological surgery
Br. J. Anaesth.,
April 1, 2007;
98(4):
470 - 476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Paech, M. W.M. Rucklidge, J. Lain, P. H. Dodd, E.-J. Bennett, and D. A. Doherty
Ondansetron and Dexamethasone Dose Combinations for Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2007;
104(4):
808 - 814.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Gan
Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2006;
102(6):
1884 - 1898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|