JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2004;99:1080-1085
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130616.57678.80


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Tactile Assessment for the Reversibility of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Blockade During Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Kyo S. Kim, MD PhD, Mi A. Cheong, MD PhD, Hee J. Lee, MD, and Jae M. Lee, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kyo Sang Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University Hospital, #17 Haengdang dong, Sungdong gu, Seoul 133-792, Korea. Address e-mail to kimks{at}hanyang.ac.kr

We sought to determine whether tactile train-of-four (TOF) count can predict the efficacy of neostigmine administration for rocuronium-induced blockade during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia, and to follow subsequent recovery until the TOF ratio reached 0.9. One-hundred-sixty patients, divided into eight equal groups, were randomly allocated to maintenance of anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane. The tactile response of the adductor pollicis to TOF stimulation was evaluated on one arm, and the mechanomyographic response was recorded on the other. Neuromuscular block was induced with rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg and maintained with rocuronium to 15% of the control first twitch in TOF. Neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg was administered on reappearance of the first (Group I), second (Group II), third (Group III), or fourth (Group IV) tactile TOF response in each anesthesia. At this time, sevoflurane or the propofol dosage was reduced in each group (n = 20 in each group). The times from administration of neostigmine until the TOF ratio recovered to 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 were recorded. The times [median (range)] to TOF ratio = 0.9 were 8.6 (4.7–18.9), 7.5 (3.4–9.8), 5.4 (1.6–8.6), and 4.7 (1.3–7.2) min in Groups I–IV during propofol anesthesia, respectively, and 28.6 (8.8–75.8), 22.6 (8.3–57.4), 15.6 (7.3–43.9), and 9.7 (5.1–26.4) min in corresponding groups during sevoflurane anesthesia, respectively (P < 0.0001). We recommend more than 2 TOF responses with propofol anesthesia and 4 TOF responses with sevoflurane anesthesia for adequate reversal within 10 and 15 min, respectively. The more tactile TOF responses present at the time of reversal achieved greater adequate recovery; however, tactile TOF responses are not a completely reliable predictor within a reasonable time period.

IMPLICATIONS: Even in the presence of train-of-four responses, the clinician should be aware that reversal may be inadequate.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
E. A. Flockton, P. Mastronardi, J. M. Hunter, C. Gomar, R. K. Mirakhur, L. Aguilera, F. G. Giunta, C. Meistelman, and M. E. Prins
Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 622 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
F. Donati
Sugammadex: an opportunity for more thinking or more cookbook medicine?/Le sugammadex: une occasion de reflechir ou de suivre la recette?
Can J Anesth, September 1, 2007; 54(9): 689 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. F. Vanacker, K. M. Vermeyen, M. M. R. F. Struys, H. Rietbergen, E. Vandermeersch, V. Saldien, A. F. Kalmar, and M. E. Prins
Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block with the Novel Drug Sugammadex Is Equally Effective Under Maintenance Anesthesia with Propofol or Sevoflurane
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Cammu, J. De Witte, J. De Veylder, G. Byttebier, D. Vandeput, L. Foubert, G. Vandenbroucke, and T. Deloof
Postoperative Residual Paralysis in Outpatients Versus Inpatients
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 426 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.