JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ozcan, M. S. Articles by Seubert, C. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ozcan, M. S. Articles by Seubert, C. N. Related Collections Complications Monitoring (Non-cardiac)

---

TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

The Effect of Body Inclination During Prone Positioning on Intraocular Pressure in Awake Volunteers: A Comparison of Two Operating Tables

Mehmet S. Ozcan, MD^*, Claudia Praetel, MD^*, M. Tariq Bhatti, MD^,,, Nikolaus Gravenstein, MD^*,, Michael E. Mahla, MD^*,, and Christoph N. Seubert, MD PhD^*

Departments of *Anesthesiology, Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida

Address correspondence to Christoph N. Seubert, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, 1600 S.W. Archer Rd., Room M-508, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL 32610-0254. Address e-mail to seubert{at}ufl.edu Reprints will not be available from the authors.

Visual loss is a rare, but catastrophic, complication of surgery in the prone position. The prone position increases intraocular pressure (IOP), which may lead to visual loss by decreasing perfusion of the anterior optic nerve. We tested whether the reverse Trendelenburg position ameliorates the increase in IOP caused by prone positioning. Furthermore, we compared two prone positioning setups. The IOP of 10 healthy awake volunteers was measured in the prone position at 3 different degrees of inclination (horizontal, 10° reverse Trendelenburg, and 10° Trendelenburg) and in the sitting and supine positions in a randomized crossover study comparing the Jackson table and the Wilson frame. In a given eye, all prone IOP values (median [25th–75th percentile] exceeded those of the sitting (15.0 mm Hg [12.8–16.3 mm Hg]) and supine (16.8mm Hg [14.0–18.3 mm Hg]) positions. IOPs in the reverse Trendelenburg, horizontal, and Trendelenburg positions were 20.3 mm Hg (16.3–22.5 mm Hg), 22.5 mm Hg (19.8–25.3 mm Hg),* and 23.8 mm Hg (21.5–26.3 mm Hg),* respectively (*P < 0.001 versus reverse Trendelenburg; P < 0.001 versus horizontal). The reverse Trendelenburg position ameliorated the increase in IOP caused by the prone position. Furthermore, the reverse Trendelenburg position decreased the number of grossly abnormal IOP values (>23 mm Hg) by 50% and 75% compared with the prone horizontal and Trendelenburg positions, respectively. The prone positioning setups did not differ in their effect on IOP. The increase in IOP caused by prone positioning was ameliorated by the reverse Trendelenburg position and was aggravated by the Trendelenburg position. The short time period between changes in position and changes in IOP suggests an important role for ocular venous pressures in determining IOP. Therefore, IOP can be beneficially manipulated by operating table inclination in the prone position.

IMPLICATIONS: This study investigated whether body inclination can improve the increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) caused by prone positioning in healthy awake volunteers. We conclude that the increase in IOP caused by prone positioning is ameliorated by the reverse Trendelenburg position and aggravated by the Trendelenburg position.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Berdahl, M. P. Fautsch, S. S. Stinnett, and R. R. Allingham Intracranial Pressure in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Normal Tension Glaucoma, and Ocular Hypertension: A Case-Control Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 5412 - 5418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Edgcombe, K. Carter, and S. Yarrow Anaesthesia in the prone position Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 165 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kamming and S. Clarke Postoperative visual loss following prone spinal surgery Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2005; 95(2): 257 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999