JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mac Murdo, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Buffington, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mac Murdo, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Buffington, C. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Airway
Right arrow Equipment

Anesth Analg 2004;99:1445-1449
© 2004 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000134799.36294.E5


TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION

Brand and Size Matter When Choosing a Syringe to Relieve Pressure in a Tracheal Tube Cuff

Stanley D. Mac Murdo, MD, and Charles W. Buffington, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Charles W. Buffington, MD, MUH N-463, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Address email to buffingtoncw{at}anes.upmc.edu

We studied the use of an inline syringe as a pressure relief valve for tracheal tube cuffs during exposure to nitrous oxide to see if the technique works. Bench testing was done to determine the stick and slip characteristics of syringes of different brands and sizes. Cuffs were inflated with 20 mL of air, producing a cuff pressure of 100–120 mm Hg. Then the plunger of the syringe was allowed to passively rebound to a steady pressure at which the plunger stopped ("stick pressure"). After several minutes, pressure in the syringe was forcibly increased with a second syringe until the plunger started moving again ("slip pressure"). Stick pressure varied from 18 to 82 mm Hg depending on the brand and size of syringe used. Slip pressures exceeded stick pressures by 20–120 mm Hg. Cuff pressure increased in a linear fashion during nitrous oxide exposure, and no syringe demonstrated automatic pressure reduction. We conclude that a syringe attached to the pilot balloon connector can be used to control tracheal tube cuff pressure during nitrous oxide anesthesia. However, not all syringes are suitable for this purpose: large syringes are better than small syringes, and the Terumo brand is more suitable than BD or Monoject. The system does not work automatically, and intermittent compression of the syringe plunger to overcome static friction is required to avoid overdistension

IMPLICATIONS: An inline syringe can be used as a pressure relief valve for tracheal tube cuffs. The brand of syringe and size are important determinants of cuff pressure. No syringe works automatically, so cuff pressure should be adjusted intermittently.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2004 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.