| JOURNAL HOME | CME HOME | THIS MONTH | PAST ISSUES | ETOC | COLLECTIONS |
| AUTHORS | REVIEWERS | EDITORIAL BOARD | FEEDBACK | RSS | HELP |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
*Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
Department of Anesthesiology, University Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Frank Wappler, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University Witten/Herdecke, Hospital Cologne-Merheim, Ostemerheimer Strassse 200, D-51109 Cologne, Germany. Address e-mail to wapplerf{at}kliniken-koeln.de
Surgical procedures on the vertebral column may result in spinal cord damage, leading to neurological deficits that demand immediate therapeutical intervention. We designed this study to determine which anesthetic regimen allows a rapid wake-up test during and after surgery to detect neurological deficits. Fifty-four patients were randomly allocated to the following groups: group PR (propofol/remifentanil): target-controlled infusion with propofol (plasma concentration, 2–4 µg/mL) and remifentanil 0.2–0.5 µg · kg–1 · min–1; group PS (propofol/sufentanil): propofol (2–4 µg/mL) and repetitive boluses of 0.1–0.2 µg/kg of sufentanil adjusted to patients requirements; and group DR (desflurane/remifentanil): desflurane/air 3.0–4.0 vol% combined with remifentanil 0.2–0.5 µg · kg–1 · min–1. Group PS required significantly longer times for the onset of breathing (8.9 ± 1.6 min), elevation of the head (17.0 ± 3.8 min), and motion of the feet (17.0 ± 7.4 min) than group PR (6.9 ± 2.6 min, 9.3 ± 2.2 min, and 9.4 ± 2.4 min, respectively) or group DR (5.4 ± 0.8 min, 6.1 ± 1.0 min, and 6.2 ± 1.0 min, respectively). The anesthetic regimen with desflurane and remifentanil allowed faster awakening during and after surgery that permitted immediate neurological examination after spinal surgery compared with propofol/remifentanil.
IMPLICATIONS: The balanced anesthetic regimen with desflurane and remifentanil allows a more rapid initial awakening during and after surgery combined with an immediate neurological examination of good quality during spinal surgery compared with propofol and remifentanil.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. J. Blusse van Oud-Alblas, J. W. B. Peters, T. G. de Leeuw, K. T. A. Vermeylen, L. W. L. de Klerk, D. Tibboel, J. Klein, and F. Weber A Comparison in Adolescents of Composite Auditory Evoked Potential Index and Bispectral Index During Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia for Scoliosis Surgery with Intraoperative Wake-Up Test Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1683 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Gopalakrishnan, D. J. Sakata, J. A. Orr, S. McJames, and D. R. Westenskow Hypercapnia Shortens Emergence Time from Inhaled Anesthesia in Pigs Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 815 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Almenrader and D. Patel Spinal fusion surgery in children with non-idiopathic scoliosis: is there a need for routine postoperative ventilation? Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2006; 97(6): 851 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Imani, A. Jafarian, V. Hassani, and Z. H. Khan Propofol-alfentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for posterior spinal fusion including wake-up test Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2006; 96(5): 583 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. O. Nafiu Is a Desflurane-Remifentanil Based Anesthetic Really the Best for the Wake-Up Test? Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 296 - 296. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Wappler Is a Desflurane-Remifentanil Based Anesthetic Really the Best for the Wake-Up Test? Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 296 - 296. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
