| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||


*Department of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Division, Spedali Riuniti S. Chiara, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;
Department of Human and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; and
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Davide Cattano, MD, via dellIsola 79, 55010 Lunata Lucca, Italy. Address e-mail to davidecattano{at}hotmail.com
Over the last decade, there has been a heightened awareness and an increase in the amount of literature being published on recognition and prediction of the difficult airway. During the preoperative evaluation of the airway, a thorough history and physical specifically related to the airway should be performed. Various measurements of anatomic features and noninvasive clinical tests can be performed to enhance this assessment. In this study we correlated the Mallampati modified score and several other indexes with the laryngoscopic view to identify anatomical and clinical risk factors related to the difficult airway. We prospectively collected data on 1956 consecutive patients scheduled to receive general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgery. The Mallampati classification versus the Cormack-Lehane (C-L) linear correlation index was 0.904. A Mallampati Class 3 correlated with a C-L Grade 2 (0.94), whereas a Mallampati Class 4 correlated with a C-L Grade 3 (0.85) and a C-L Grade 4 (0.80). Operator evaluation, performed by a simplified tracheal intubation difficulty scale, showed a linear correlation of 0.96 compared with the C-L groups. Although there is a correlation between oropharyngeal volume and difficult intubation, the Mallampati score by itself is insufficient for predicting difficult endotracheal intubation.
IMPLICATIONS: We collected data to correlate anatomical indexes and the difficult airway. The Mallampati score correlates with the laryngoscopic view (Cormack-Lehane score), but it is not useful in the prediction of difficult intubation as a single risk factor.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Shippey, D. Ray, and D. McKeown Use of the McGrath(R) videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 116 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Reed Intubation training in emergency medicine: a review of one trainee's first 100 procedures Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 654 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Cattano, S. Abramson, S. Buzzigoli, C. Zoppi, E. Melai, F. Giunta, and C. Hagberg The use of the laryngeal mask airway during guidewire dilating forceps tracheostomy. Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 453 - 7, table of contents. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lee, L. T. Y. Fan, T. Gin, M. K. Karmakar, and W. D. Ngan Kee A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1867 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Kim and J. J. Lee Preoperative predictors of difficult intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: [Predicteurs preoperatoires d'une intubation difficile chez des patients qui presentent de l'apnee obstructive du sommeil]. Can J Anesth, April 1, 2006; 53(4): 393 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Naguib, F. L. Scamman, C. O'Sullivan, J. Aker, A. F. Ross, S. Kosmach, and J. E. Ensor Predictive performance of three multivariate difficult tracheal intubation models: a double-blind, case-controlled study. Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 818 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kristensen Identifying and Evaluating Predictors of a Difficult Airway: The Importance of Not Excluding the Really Interesting Patients Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 928 - 928. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|