JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, G. T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, M. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, G. T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, M. G.

Anesth Analg 2009;0:ANE.0b013e3181b8b77e
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b8b77e

Activation of Central Opioid Receptors Induces Cardioprotection Against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Gordon T. C. Wong, FANZCA*, Jiang Ling Ling, MD*,{dagger}, and Michael G. Irwin, MD*

From the *Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; and {dagger}Department of Anaesthesiology, Anhui Medical University, China.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gordon T. C. Wong, FANZCA, Room 424, K Block, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong. Address e-mail to gordon{at}hkucc.hku.hk.

Abstract

Background: Small doses of intrathecal morphine provide cardioprotection similar to that conferred by IV morphine and ischemic preconditioning (IPC). We investigated the relative role of central versus peripheral opioid receptors in intrathecal morphine preconditioning (ITMPC).

Methods: Forty-eight anesthetized, open-chest, male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to 1 of 7 treatment groups (n = 6–7) after successful intrathecal catheter placement. ITMPC was achieved by 3 consecutive 5-min intrathecal infusions of morphine (1.0 µg/kg each). This was repeated in the presence of either IV (IV naloxone methiodide + ITMPC) or intrathecally (intrathecal naloxone methiodide [ITNM] + ITMPC) administered naloxone methiodide. This compound was also given via these same routes in the absence of ITMPC (IV naloxone methiodide + ITNM). Intrathecal normal saline and IPC were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury were induced by 30 min of left main coronary artery occlusion followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Myocardial infarct size, as a percentage of the area-at-risk, was determined by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium staining.

Results: The infarct size/area-at-risk were significantly reduced in the IPC (22% ± 3%) and ITMPC (26% ± 5%) groups compared with the control group (48% ± 9%) (P < 0.01). The addition of ITNM reversed the cardioprotective effects of ITMPC (45% ± 4%), whereas IV administration of the drug did not have any effect on ITMPC (28% ± 9%, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Intrathecally administered morphine can produce cardioprotective effects via the activation of central opioid receptors, without the apparent involvement of peripheral opioid receptors.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.