| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The membrane potential of endothelial cells is an important determinant of endothelial functions, including regulation of vascular tone. We investigated whether adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels were involved in the response of membrane potential to hyperosmolality in cultured human aorta endothelial cells. The voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye, bis-(1,3-diethylthiobarbiturate)trimethine oxonol, was used to assess relative changes in membrane potential semiquantitatively. To investigate the effect of mannitol-, sucrose-, and NaCl-induced hyperosmolality on membrane potential, cells were continuously perfused with Earles balanced salt solution (285 mOsm/kg H2O) containing 200 nM bis-(1,3-diethylthiobarbiturate)trimethine oxonol and exposed to 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O hyperosmotic medium sequentially in the presence and absence of 1 µM glibenclamide, a well-known KATP channel blocker. Hyperosmotic mannitol significantly induced hyperpolarization of the endothelial cells, which was prevented by 1 µM glibenclamide (n = 6). Estimated changes of membrane potential at 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O were 13 ± 8 and 21 ± 8 mV, respectively. Hypertonic sucrose induced similar changes. However, although hypertonic saline also significantly induced hyperpolarization of the endothelial cells (n = 6), the hyperpolarization was not prevented by 1 µM glibenclamide. In conclusion, KATP channels may participate in hyperosmotic mannitol- and sucrose-induced hyperpolarization, but not in hypertonic saline-induced hyperpolarization in cultured human aorta endothelial cells.
Hyperosmotic mannitol (1,2) and hypertonic saline (3) are often used clinically for the management of increased intracranial pressure and hypovolemic shock, respectively. In addition, tissue osmolality increases during ischemia and exercise (4,5). Infusion of osmotic agents can cause vasodilation (3,6). Increased tissue osmolality also has an important role in regional vasodilation (4,5). There is evidence to suggest that the response could be mediated by membrane hyperpolarization of vascular endothelial cells (4). Endothelial hyperpolarization may cause vasodilation by transferring the membrane hyperpolarization to the underlying smooth muscle cells via gap junctions (4,79) or by stimulating the Ca2+-dependent release of vasoactive compounds, such as nitric oxide and prostacyclin, from endothelial cells (3,810). Mechanisms of hyperosmolality-induced endothelial hyperpolarization have not yet been elucidated. Some evidence suggests that hyperosmolar glucose or sucrose solution may activate adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels leading to hyperpolarization of vascular endothelial cells (4,5). However, direct evidence for the participation of KATP channels in hyperosmolality-induced endothelial hyperpolarization has not yet been obtained. Indeed, another report suggests that KATP channel activating agents may cause hyperpolarization of endothelial cells, which may occur through gap junction-mediated transfer of smooth muscle hyperpolarization to the endothelium (11). We investigated a relationship between activation of the KATP channels and hyperpolarization in the absence of vascular smooth muscle. Furthermore, although both hypertonic saline and hyperosmotic sucrose increase myocardial contractility, the mechanisms are different (12). The sodium ion itself has a key role in this improvement of myocardial contractility through a specific mechanism involving Na+-Ca2+ exchange (12). Na+-Ca2+ exchange is not involved in the sucrose-induced improvement of contractility (12). To better understand the mechanism by which hyperosmolality affects membrane potential, we investigated the effects of mannitol-, sucrose-, and NaCl-induced hyperosmolality on membrane potential in the presence or absence of glibenclamide, a well known KATP channel blocker, in cultured human aorta endothelial cells.
Cell Culture Human aorta endothelial cells, which were certified to be virus-free and pure cell populations on the basis of staining patterns for -actin, were obtained from Cell Application, Inc. (San Diego, CA). The cells were routinely maintained in cell culture medium (Cell Application) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The third to sixth passage cultures were then seeded onto glass-bottom culture dishes (MatTek Corp., Ashford, MA) and allowed to reach subconfluence in 57 days.
Reagents
Cell Perfusion System
Measurement of Membrane Potential
Experimental Protocols As a test for the presence of KATP channels in cultured human aortic endothelial cells, we investigated the effects of levcromakalim on membrane potential. The cells were exposed to levcromakalim in the presence or absence of glibenclamide. The values at 20 and 40 min after the baseline point were used for statistical analysis.
Calibration of Bis-Oxonol Fluorescence
Materials All results were expressed as means ± sd. Values were compared using analysis of variance with the Scheffé post hoc test. A value of P < 0.05 was accepted as significant.
With infusion of the bis-oxonol and continuous monitoring, fluorescence from the endothelial cells increased and attained a steady level after 2030 min. The effects of mannitol-induced hyperosmolality on membrane potential in the presence and absence of glibenclamide were studied. Results obtained from representative cells are illustrated in (Figure 1A. The relative bis-oxonol fluorescences at 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O in the hyperosmolality (mannitol) group were significantly different from those in the isotonic time control group (Fig. 2B), indicating membrane hyperpolarization via mannitol-induced hyperosmolality. Hyperpolarizations of the membrane potential were 13 ± 8 and 21 ± 8 mV, respectively, as calculated from the calibration curve obtained with cultured human aortic endothelial cells. Glibenclamide did not alter the resting membrane potential. The relative bis-oxonol fluorescences in the hyperosmolality (mannitol) + glibenclamide group were significantly different from those in the hyperosmolality (mannitol) group (Fig. 2B), indicating participation of the KATP channel in hyperosmotic mannitol-induced hyperpolarization. The estimated hyper-polarizations of the membrane potential in the hyperosmolality (mannitol) + glibenclamide group were 2 ± 4 and 1 ± 3 mV at 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O mannitol, respectively. The relative bis-oxonol fluorescences in the hyperosmolality (mannitol) + glibenclamide group were not significantly different from those in the isotonic time control group.
The effects of NaCl-induced hyperosmolality on membrane potential in the presence and absence of glibenclamide were studied. Results obtained from representative cells are illustrated in (Figure 3A. The relative bis-oxonol fluorescences at 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O in the hyperosmolality (NaCl) group were significantly different from those in the isotonic time control group (Fig. 3B), indicating membrane hyperpolarization via NaCl-induced hyperosmolality. The estimated hyperpolarizations of the membrane potential were 15 ± 6 and 19 ± 8 mV, respectively. Relative bis-oxonol fluorescences at 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O in the hyperosmolality (NaCl) + glibenclamide group were not significantly different from those in the hyperosmolality (NaCl) group (Fig. 3B), indicating absence of the KATP channels participation in hyperosmotic saline-induced hyperpolarization. The estimated hyperpolarizations of the membrane potential in the hyperosmolality (NaCl) + glibenclamide group were 13 ± 7 and 23 ± 9 mV, respectively
The effects of sucrose-induced hyperosmolality on membrane potential in the presence and absence of glibenclamide were studied. The results obtained from representative cells are illustrated in (Figure 3A. The relative bis-oxonol fluorescences at 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O in the hyperosmolality (sucrose) group were significantly different from those in the isotonic time control group (Fig. 4B), indicating membrane hyperpolarization via sucrose-induced hyperosmolality. The estimated hyperpolarizations of the membrane potential were 9 ± 2 and 17 ± 9 mV, respectively. The relative bis-oxonol fluorescences in the hyperosmolality (sucrose) + glibenclamide group were significantly different from those in the hyperosmolality (sucrose) group (Fig. 4B), indicating participation of the KATP channel in hyperosmotic sucrose-induced hyperpolarization. The estimated hyperpolarizations of the membrane potential in the hyperosmolality (sucrose) + glibenclamide group were 0 ± 8 and 1 ± 13 mV, respectively. The relative bis-oxonol fluorescences in the hyperosmolality (sucrose) + glibenclamide group were not significantly different from those in the isotonic time control group.
The application of 1 µM levcromakalim to endothelial cells caused a sustained decrease in fluorescence (Fig. 5). The estimated membrane-potential change was 20 ± 10 mV. The subsequent application of 1 µM levcromakalim plus 1 µM glibenclamide resulted in the slow recovery of the resting potential, indicating the presence of KATP channels in the cultured human aorta endothelial cells.
The main findings of the present study were that all investigated hyperosmolar solutions hyperpolarized the cultured human aorta endothelial cells. Although the activation of KATP channels may participate in hyperosmolar mannitol- and hyperosmolar sucrose-induced membrane hyperpolarization, it may not participate in hypertonic saline-induced membrane hyperpolarization. We demonstrated that hyperosmolar solutions caused membrane hyperpolarization in human aorta endothelium cells in this study. The magnitudes of hyperpolarization were similar among the three groups. Endothelial hyperpolarization results in vasodilation as described in the Introduction. Thus, these findings coincide well with a previous report that hyperosmotic mannitol and hypertonic saline dilated cerebral arteries to a similar degree, and the effect seemed to be attributable solely to an increase in osmolality (6). Very few studies have evaluated the hyperosmolality-induced hyperpolarization in endothelial cells directly (9,17). Voets et al. (9) reported that cultured bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells with membrane potentials more negative than the reversal potential for chloride were hyperpolarized by 15 mV with the addition of 100 mM mannitol. In contrast, in isolated rat aorta endothelial cells, the addition of 100 mM sucrose evoked a small (<5 mV) depolarization of the endothelial membrane potential (17). Estimated changes in membrane potential by the addition of 30 and 60 mM mannitol were approximately 13 and 21 mV in this study. The relatively large change in our experiment might be explained by a difference of vessel, species, or experimental conditions. Hyperosmotic mannitol-induced membrane hyperpolarization was inhibited by 1 µM glibenclamide in this study. Most evidence suggests that glibenclamide selectively blocks KATP channels at a concentration of 1 µM (18). In addition, Ishizaka and Kuo (4) reported that Ca2+-activated or inward rectifier potassium channels have no effect on hyperosmolality-induced vasodilation. And activation of Ca2+-activated potassium channels induced only a small hyperpolarization (approximately 2.5 mV) in endothelial cells (11). Thus, our results suggest that KATP channels participate in hyperosmotic mannitol-induced membrane hyperpolarization. These findings coincide well with a previous report that non-ionic hyperosmolar solutions may activate KATP channels in endothelial cells using diameter measurements in isolated cannulated and pressurized porcine coronary arterioles (4) as well as skeletal muscle arterioles (5). KATP channels have been found on vascular endothelial cells (10) and activation of these channels hyperpolarizes the endothelial cells (8,14). An experimental concern is that endothelial cells may undergo significant changes in culture (8). We demonstrated that 1 µM levcromakalim, a KATP channel opener, hyperpolarized the human aorta endothelial cells by 20 mV and the effects of levcromakalim could be reversed by an application of 1 µM glibenclamide in this study. Most evidence suggests that 1 µM levcromakalim selectively activates KATP channels at this concentration (18). These findings suggest that our cultured cells expressed KATP channels. It is of note that the potency of 1 µM levcromakalim to cause hyperpolarization of the endothelial cells was close to the data in cultured human umbilical veins (14 mV) (14) and in freshly isolated coronary capillaries (30 mV) (8,10) induced by various K+ channel openers. The mechanisms for the non-ionic hyperosmolar solution-induced activation of KATP channels have not been elucidated. Many channels including KATP channels can determine the endothelial membrane potential (9,15,19,20) and the effects of these channels on endothelial membrane potential are complex and multifactorial (9,19,20). For example, Doughty et al. (19) reported that hyperpolarization by an inwardly rectifying potassium current depends on the magnitude of a volume-sensitive chloride current, which can be inhibited by hyperosmolality. One possible explanation of KATP channel activation is the activation of Na+-K+-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) induced by regulatory volume increase after cell shrinkage (20). Regulatory volume increases are coupled with increased Na+-K+-ATPase activity (20,21). Na+-K+-ATPase activation may lead to the activation of KATP channels (22) via submembrane ATP depletion (23). However, further experiments will be required to check these possibilities and shrinkage itself may increase intracellular adenosine diphosphate concentration and/or activate other regulatory mechanisms, such as integrin-mediated mechanotransduction pathways (4). Thus, based on this information, we assumed that hyperosmotic mannitol activated KATP channels. Hyperosmotic sucrose indicates almost the same result with mannitol. Thus, these effects are not mannitol-specific effects, but common effects in non-ionic hyperosmotic agents. Hypertonic saline also induced hyperpolarization in this study. However, KATP channels were not involved in hypertonic saline-induced membrane hyperpolarization in contrast to hyperosmotic mannitol. A major difference between hyperosmotic mannitol and hypertonic saline is their effect on intra- and/or extracellular electrolyte concentrations (12,20). If extracellular osmolality is made hypertonic by increased extracellular NaCl concentration, the increase of intracellular Cl activity could impede a regulatory volume increase (20,21). This inhibition may result in the failure of KATP channel activation, as described in the early part of this discussion. However, KATP channel-independent hyperosmolality-induced membrane hyperpolarization is possible. Hypertonic saline causes hyperchloridemia. Cl removal from the extracellular space or low Cl leads to depolarization (15). Thus, although mechanisms remain to be clarified, these effects of electrolytes may participate in the difference in mechanisms. Mannitol is used to reduce intracranial pressure and decrease brain bulk in neurosurgical patients (1,2). The administration of 2 mg/kg of 20% mannitol infused at a rate of 15 mL/min and 1 mg/kg infused over 4 minutes increases the plasma osmolality by 30 (1) and 36 mOsm/kg H2O (2), respectively. The interstitial osmolality of the myocardium increases by 20 and 40 mOsm/kg H2O within 10 and 50 minutes, respectively, after coronary occlusion in porcine hearts (24). Therefore, the osmolalities of 315 and 345 mOsm/kg H2O chosen in this study are clinically relevant. The bis-oxonol dye system semiquantitatively captures the behavior of cell membrane-potential responsiveness to various stimuli. The bis-oxonol dye response time is relatively slow (a few seconds), which prevents measurements of precise physiological time constants associated with membrane-potential change (15). However, conventional direct measurement of membrane potential with a patch electrode or glass microelectrode has the risk of electrical and mechanical perturbation. The minimal invasiveness of the dye to the cells makes this technique attractive (15). Furthermore, the recording of the membrane potential with bis-oxonol could be especially useful for indirectly testing KATP channel activities, because the washout of cytosolic constitutes occurring during conventional whole cell measurements is avoided (8). Limitations of this study should be clarified. Physiological blood vessels are exposed to flow (15) and intraluminal pressure (7). Those factors might alter the membrane potential of endothelial cells (15). Resting membrane potentials are important for the response in membrane potential to various stimuli in endothelial cells (19). Therefore, the response to hyperosmolality in physiological conditions might differ. We used aortic endothelial cells. We should explore findings in endothelial cells in other organs with caution. However, the maintenance of normal aorta endothelial function itself is important. The aorta is a dynamic organ, capable of almost instantaneous changes in size and elasticity (25). The elastic properties of the aorta are an important determinant of left ventricular function and coronary blood flow (25). The decrease of fluorescence with application of hyperosmolar mannitol did not reach a plateau at 315 mOsm/kg H2O. Therefore, we might underestimate the hyperpolarization at 315 mOsm/kg H2O. However, this possible underestimation does not have a major effect on the findings. Despite some limitations, our results may explain in part the mechanism by which hyperosmolality affects membrane potential and vascular tone. In conclusion, all hyperosmotic agents induced membrane depolarization in cultured human aorta endothelial cells. Our results suggest that KATP channels participate in hyperosmotic mannitol- and sucrose-induced membrane hyperpolarization in cultured human aorta endothelial cells. Different mechanisms may participate in hypertonic saline-induced hyperpolarization.
This study was supported by a Grant-in Aid (12671476) for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan. Accepted for publication August 10, 2004.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|