JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. J.

Anesth Analg 2005;100:597-598
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143462.92889.6D


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Anaphylaxis Is Not a Dose/Response Effect

W. John Russell, MD

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, john.russell{at}adelaide.edu.au

To the Editor:

The case report (1) on latex anaphylaxis illustrates well the problem of identifying the trigger agent when there are two or more coincidental potential triggers such as, in this report, the administration of an antibiotic and the beginning of surgery.

However, it is important to understand that the anaphylactic reaction is the result of a specific IgE immunoglobulin binding into a receptor site and triggering a cascade. This releases many active agents, including tyrosine kinases, histamine, tryptases, proteoglycans, and leukotrienes (2,3) This process consumes both the IgE and the active agents, which is why at least 4 weeks delay is recommended before the provocative testing of suspected triggering agents (4).

It was therefore disturbing to read that the authors considered that it was "important to convert to a latex-free environment during the resuscitation." This is illogical, as the initial event has almost certainly depleted both the triggering antibody and the vasoactive agents. Any attempt to guess and remove the possible triggers is futile and may interfere with the appropriate treatment.

If a major anaphylaxis occurs, prompt active resuscitation is required. Removing the possible triggers is unnecessary, and even giving more of the triggering agent is not contraindicated, as this is not a phenomenon with a therapeutic dose/response curve, and the associated depletion of the IgE and mast cells means that there will not be any progression of the anaphylactic reaction if additional agent is given. This is a crucial difference from an adverse response with a dose relationship.

References

  1. Hebl JR, Hall BA, Sprung J. Prolonged cardiovascular collapse due to unrecognized latex anaphylaxis. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1124–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hefner DL, Castells MC. Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1381–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kay AB. Allergy and allergic diseases. New Engl J Med 2001;344:30–7.[Free Full Text]
  4. Fisher MM. Intradermal testing after anaphylactoid reactions to anaesthetic drugs: practical aspects of performance and interpretation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1984;12:115–20.[ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. J.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press