JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shawky, J. E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shawky, J. E. S.

Anesth Analg 2005;100:901-902
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000146659.12374.60


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

A New Friendly Approach to Pediatric Inhaled Induction

Jihan El Sayed Shawky, MD

King Fahad National Guard Hospital; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Gehan55555{at}hotmail.com

To the Editor:

Inhaled induction of anesthesia is a commonly used method by pediatric anesthesiologists. Sevoflurane induction is smooth and rapid; however, children tend to resist the application of the mask on their face. Exaggerated preoperative child’s anxiety has been reported to result in adverse behavioral outcomes that can be extended up to 2 weeks postoperatively (1,2). Several methods have been introduced to overcome this problem. Parental presence during induction, special operating room environment, premedications, and using specific induction techniques helped to decrease preoperative child’s anxiety. I report a new method to help the children accept the anesthetic face mask and to obtain nonturbulent induction.

I have designed a three dimensional mask of common characters that are popular among children, for example, animals, birds, and famous cartoon characters. The mask is made of colored thin foam sheets with two big openings for the eyes and the space for the nose and mouth is left for the connection with the anesthetic mask at the inflation port of its air cushion through a small opening in the middle of the lower part of the character mask. The mask is attached to the child’s ears by two rubber bands or one rubber band attached near the ears and fixed behind the head. The child is then given a mirror to look at his funny face (Fig. 1). When we ask him to blow up the balloon, it will be like a game.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, mirror offered to the child to look at his funny face after application of the character mask. B, induction of anesthesia with the character mask in place.

 

After obtaining our local Ethics Committee’s approval and parents’ consent, 56 children aged 2–10 years undergoing routine outpatient surgery were offered to choose the character mask they like. The attending anesthesiologist connected the suitable sized anesthetic face mask to the character mask, and the assembled new mask was applied to the child’s face. We observed whether the child accepted or refused the mask. A parent was allowed to attend the induction phase. In the operating room, the anesthetic circuit was primed with 8% sevoflurane in oxygen/nitrous (1:1) and attached to the anesthetic face mask that is already fit to the child’s face. When the child lost consciousness, the character mask was removed and anesthetic induction was continued as planned. The parent was asked about his or her impression of the anesthetic induction, and their response was graded as indifferent, good, and excellent.

Forty-nine children (87.5%) accepted the mask and 7 of 56 (12.5%) refused the application of the mask. Of the 49 patients who accepted the mask, parents’ impression was as follows: 42 excellent, 5 good, and 2 indifferent.

We think this new mask is a new successful tool that can be added to the arsenal of methods used to make inhaled induction more acceptable by children.

References

  1. Kain ZN, Wang SM, Mayes LC, et al. Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes. Anesth Analg 1999;88:1042–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, O’Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV. Preoperative anxiety in children: predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996;150:1238–45.[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shawky, J. E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shawky, J. E. S.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press