JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilotta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilotta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, G.

Anesth Analg 2005;100:1860-1861
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000156599.34224.E0


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Post-CABG Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Federico Bilotta, MD, PhD, Luciano Agati, MD, Laura Fiorani, MD, and Giovanni Rosa, MD

Departments of Anesthesiology and Cardiology, Policlinico Umberto I and Ospedale S Andrea, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy, bilotta{at}tiscali.it

To the Editor:

Leung et al. (1) investigated the role of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for intraoperative evaluation of left ventricular contractile reserve to predict myocardial viability. Dobutamine was administered after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass at 10 µg · kg–1 · min–1 rising doses up to 40 µg · kg–1 · min–1.

The authors identified a "normal dobutamine stress echocardiography " response as an increase in wall thickening during the test in normal segments at baseline and a "positive test" as new or worsening regional wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Viability was tested within 1 wk with thallium. A normal response was highly specific for viable myocardium, whereas a positive response had low sensitivity in predicting nonviable myocardium.

We would like to make the following comments:

Information about segmental contractile status before coronary artery bypass grafting is of crucial importance for distinguishing viable from nonviable segments (2,3). Only dysfunctioning segments at baseline improving or worsening during dobutamine stress echocardiography have to be considered as viable. Conversely, akinetic segments at baseline showing neither worsening nor new abnormalities should be considered nonviable (4,5), although this study possibly included these in the "normal segments." Similarly, segments having worsening segmental function after coronary artery bypass grafting with large-dobutamine dose should be considered ischemic and thus viable (4,5), although this study included these in the "positive segments."

In segments revascularized with arterial conduits, full restoration of coronary blood flow may need hours to days before normal myocardial perfusion is established (4). There could be serious concern about administering large-dose dobutamine in these patients.

A total of 16 segments during small-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography and 25 segments during large-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography had "positive test." Do these segments belong to the 78 patients that completed the thallium studies?

References

  1. Leung JM, Bellows WH, Pastor D. Does intraoperative evaluation of left ventricular contractile reserve predict myocardial viability? A clinical study using dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg 2004;99:647–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Voci P, Bilotta F, Aronson S, et al. Echocardiographic analysis of dysfunctional and normal myocardial segments before and immediately after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg 1992;75:213–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Voci P, Bilotta F, Caretta Q, et al. Low-dose dobutamine echocardiography predicts the early response of dysfunctioning myocardial segments to coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 1995;129:521–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Agati L, Voci P, Autore C, et al. Combined use of dobutamine echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting regional dysfunctional recovery after coronary revascularization in patients with recent myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1997;18:771–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Agati L, Autore C, Iacoboni C, et al. The complex relation between myocardial viability and functional recovery in chronic left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1998;81(12A): 33G–5.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilotta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilotta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Rosa, G.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press