JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schafhalter-Zoppoth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schafhalter-Zoppoth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, A.

Anesth Analg 2005;101:611
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159011.02691.23


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Ultrasound Evidence of Intraneural Injection

Ingeborg Schafhalter-Zoppoth, MD, Ivan D. Zeitz, MD, and Andrew Gray, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care; University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco General Hospital; San Francisco, CA; graya{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu

In Response:

We thank Dr. Chan for his interest in our report and his insightful commentary. Although intraneural injection has been the focus of recent investigations (1), sonographic evidence has been limited. One case of ultrasound imaging obtained in follow-up after presumed intraneural injection has been published (2). Since acceptance of our manuscript a case series of ultrasound guided injections into neuromas has been described (3). In contrast, our letter reports injection into the normal fasciculated tissue of the femoral nerve (4).

We emphasize that most of the 35-mL injection is extraneural, with only approximately 0.1 mL being considered intraneural (assuming limited longitudinal distribution with equal spread in all directions within the nerve). We agree with Dr. Chan and other authors on the basic principle that intraneural injection acutely expands nerve structure (5–8). Our transverse sonograms show fasciculated femoral nerve architecture (9) on both sides of the block needle. Even without a surgical pathology specimen, our ultrasound scans and clinical course make a highly compelling case for intraneural injection. In clinical practice we have appreciated anatomic divisions of the femoral nerve only rarely during these procedures (approximately 2 in 73 cases of femoral nerve blocks with ultrasound guidance) and do not include our case as one such example.

Dr. Chan presents new experimental data demonstrating high-volume (10 mL) injections into porcine brachial plexus nerves. However, one potentially important issue is that the consequences of intraneural injection in a dividing nerve may be quite different than injection in a discrete nerve without local branching. These new data raise many exciting questions regarding characteristic internal signs of nerve injection injury that can be answered with real time high-resolution ultrasound imaging. More importantly, a major safety goal with imaging is to develop techniques that improve needle (10) and nerve visibility to reduce block-related complications.

References

  1. Hadzic A, Dilberovic F, Shah S, et al. Combination of intraneural injection and high injection pressure leads to fascicular injury and neurologic deficits in dogs. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29:417–23.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Graif M, Seton A, Nerubai J, et al. Sciatic nerve: Sonographic evaluation and anatomic-pathologic considerations. Radiology 1991;181:405–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gruber H, Kovacs P, Peer S, et al. Sonographically guided phenol injection in painful stump neuroma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:952–4.[Free Full Text]
  4. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Zeitz ID, Gray AT. Inadvertent femoral nerve impalement and intraneural injection visualized by ultrasound. Anesth Analg 2004;99:627–8.[Free Full Text]
  5. Selander D, Sjostrand J. Longitudinal spread of intraneurally injected local anesthetics: An experimental study of the initial neural distribution following intraneural injections. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1978;22:622–34.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Gentili F, Hudson AR, Kline D, Hunter D. Early changes following injection injury of peripheral nerves. Can J Surg 1980;23:177–82.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Rayan GM, Gannaway JK, Pitha J, Dale GL. Peripheral nerve changes following epineurial injection of saline and blood in rat sciatic nerve. Clin Orthop 1985;193:299–307.
  8. Sala-Blanch X, Pomes J, Matute P, et al. Intraneural injection during anterior approach for sciatic nerve block. Anesthesiology 2004;101:1027–30.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Gruber H, Peer S, Kovacs P, et al. The ultrasonographic appearance of the femoral nerve and cases of iatrogenic impairment. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:163–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, McCulloch CE, Gray AT. Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: An in vitro study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29:480–8.[ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schafhalter-Zoppoth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schafhalter-Zoppoth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, A.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press