JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, U.

Anesth Analg 2005;101:1065-1067
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000167775.46192.e9


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

The Efficacy of Tolterodine for Prevention of Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study

Anil Agarwal, MD*, Mehdi Raza, MD*, Vinay Singhal, MD*, Sanjay Dhiraaj, MD*, Rakesh Kapoor, MS, McH{dagger}, Aneesh Srivastava, MS, McH{dagger}, Devendra Gupta, MD*, Prabhat K. Singh, MD*, Chandra Kant Pandey, MD*, and Uttam Singh, PhD{ddagger}

Departments of *Anesthesia, {dagger}Surgical Urology, and {ddagger}Biostatistics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bladder discomfort secondary to an indwelling urinary catheter is distressing, particularly for patients awakening from anesthesia. We sought to discover the incidence and severity of bladder discomfort in patients who were catheterized intraoperatively and to evaluate the efficacy of tolterodine, a pure muscarinic receptor antagonist, in preventing this. Two-hundred-fifteen consecutive adult patients, ASA physical status I and II, either sex, undergoing urologic surgery requiring bladder catheterization were enrolled. Group C (control, n = 165) received placebo and group T (tolterodine, n = 50) received tolterodine 2 mg. Drugs were administered orally 1 h before surgery. After induction of anesthesia, patients were catheterized with a 16F Foley catheter and the balloon was inflated with 10 mL of normal saline. In the postanesthesia care unit, bladder discomfort was assessed on arrival (0), 1, 2 and 6 h. Severity of bladder discomfort was graded as mild, moderate, and severe. Bladder discomfort observed in group C was 55% (91 of 165). Tolterodine reduced both the incidence 36% (18 of 50) and severity of bladder discomfort (P < 0.05).


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bladder discomfort secondary to an indwelling urinary catheter is very distressing and this is more so in patients awakening from anesthesia. It is not unusual to find patients catheterized during anesthesia complaining of an urge to void in the postoperative period because of catheter-related bladder irritation. Various treatments have been tried with varying degrees of success for managing this troublesome side effect (1). Tolterodine, a competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist, has been used successfully to treat overactive bladder (urgency, urge incontinence, and micturition frequency) (2).

The incidence and severity of bladder discomfort secondary to an indwelling urinary catheter has not been reported. We conducted this study to evaluate the incidence and severity of bladder discomfort in patients who were catheterized intraoperatively and to evaluate the efficacy of tolterodine in attenuating this discomfort.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
After approval from the Institute's ethics committee and written informed consent from the patients, we initially conducted a pilot study of 50 surgical patients who were catheterized intraoperatively and observed that 26 (52%) of the patients complained of bladder discomfort in the postoperative period. Assuming that the incidence of bladder discomfort would decrease to 30% after tolterodine administration, we enrolled 165 patients in the control group (group C) and 50 in the tolterodine group (group T) for the results to be statistically significant with a power of 80% and {alpha} = 0.05. Therefore, 215 consecutive adults, ASA physical status I and II patients of either sex, undergoing elective endoscopic or open urologic surgery for the kidney and ureter and requiring catheterization were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Patients were randomized with the help of a computer-generated table of random numbers into two groups. Group C (n = 165) received placebo and group T (n = 50) received tolterodine 2 mg (Detrusitol, Pharmacia Italia S.p.A). Both drugs were given orally 1 h before induction of anesthesia. Exclusion criteria were bladder outflow obstruction, transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prosthetic hyperplasia, elderly patients (age >60 yr), overactive bladder (frequency >3 times in the night or >8 times in 24 h), end-stage renal disease (urine output <500 mL/24 h).

The patients were premedicated with oral lorazepam 0.04 mg/kg the night before and 2 h before the induction of anesthesia. Induction of anesthesia was done with fentanyl 3 µg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg was given as muscle relaxant. Patients were catheterized using a 16F Foley catheter and its balloon was inflated with 10 mL of normal saline. Anesthesia was maintained using 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and a propofol infusion of 50–150 µg · kg–1 · min–1 and intermittent fentanyl and vecuronium as required. At the end of surgery, the muscle relaxant was reversed using neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg and patients were transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). In the PACU, all patients were connected to IV patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management.

Bladder discomfort (urge to pass urine or discomfort in the suprapubic region) was assessed by an anesthesia senior resident, who was unaware of the type of medication received by the patient, on arrival in the PACU (0 h) and again at 1, 2, and 6 h later. Severity of bladder discomfort was recorded as mild (reported by the patient only on questioning), moderate (reported by the patient without questioning; not accompanied by any behavioral responses), or severe (reported by the patient and accompanied by behavioral responses). Behavioral responses observed were flailing limbs, strong vocal response, and attempts to remove the catheter.

The presence or absence of adverse effects, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting, facial flushing, dry mouth, blurred vision, and abdominal discomfort, were also noted. The incidence of bladder discomfort between groups was analyzed by Z test, whereas, severity of discomfort (mild, moderate, and severe) was analyzed by Fisher's exact test. SPSS 9.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There was no significant difference in the patient characteristics and fentanyl requirement in the postoperative period in both groups (Table 1). No significant difference was observed in the percentage of patients undergoing endoscopic or open urologic procedures. In group C, 63% of patients underwent endoscopic surgery compared with 60% in group T.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic Data and Fentanyl Consumption

 

The overall incidence of bladder discomfort was significantly less in group T compared with group C at all time points (Table 2). Absolute risk reduction with tolterodine was 19%, the relative risk reduction was 35%, and the number-needed-to-treat was 5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Incidence of Bladder Discomfort

 

In group T, 54% of patients reported a dry mouth at 0 h compared with only 22% in group C (P < 0.05). At 1 h, the incidence was 66% versus 47% (P < 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of dry mouth at 2 and 6 h. Similarly, there were no differences in the incidence of other side effects between the groups at any time.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our study demonstrates that the maximum incidence of bladder discomfort occurs at 1 hour after arrival in the PACU. In group C, 55% of the patients who were catheterized reported bladder discomfort compared with 36% in group T.

The increase in the incidence of bladder discomfort at 1 hour when compared with 0 hour could have been attributed to the fact that, on arrival in the PACU, patients might not have been able to comprehend and communicate their discomfort properly because of the residual effects of anesthetics.

The innervations of the urinary tract are derived from three sets of peripheral nerves: sacral parasympathetic, thoracolumbar sympathetic, and sacral somatic (primarily the pudendal nerves) (3). Overactive bladder is characterized by the symptoms of urinary frequency and urgency, with or without urge incontinence. These involuntary contractions of the bladder are mediated by muscarinic receptors (4,5). Therefore, antimuscarinic drugs are the mainstay of treatment of overactive bladder.

Tolterodine is the first antimuscarinic drug to be specifically developed for the treatment of overactive bladder. Tolterodine is a competitive pure muscarinic receptor antagonist. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, reaching peak plasma levels within 1–2 hours after administration (6). Chen et al. (7) evaluated the efficacy of tolterodine on bladder spasm caused by an indwelling catheter after prostate surgery. Tolterodine and its metabolite 5-HM showed functional selectivity for the bladder over the salivary glands in vivo compared with oxybutynin, another antimuscarinic drug (8).

A limitation of our study is that we have evaluated the response of a single dose of tolterodine on catheter-related bladder discomfort in patients undergoing urologic surgery. We did not evaluate the dose response titration, nor have we evaluated the effect of continuing the therapy in the postoperative period. We have not evaluated its role in patients undergoing all types of surgical procedures, even in patients who are catheterized for other medical procedures not requiring any surgical intervention. Further studies in these areas are suggested.

In conclusion, oral tolterodine (2 mg) administered 1 hour before surgery significantly reduced the incidence and severity of bladder discomfort in our patients. We therefore suggest that tolterodine can be safely given to patients preoperatively to minimize catheter-induced bladder discomfort.


    Footnotes
 
Accepted for publication March 30, 2005.

Address correspondence and reprint request to Dr. Anil Agarwal, Type IV/48, SGPGIMS, Lucknow 226 014, India. Address e-mail to aagarwal{at}sgpgi.ac.in.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Park JM, Houck CS, Sethna NF, et al. Ketorolac suppresses postoperative bladder spasms after paediatric ureteral reimplantation. Anesth Analg 2000;91:11–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wefer J, Truss MC, Jonas U. Tolterodine: an overview. World J Urol 2001;19:312–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. de Groat WC. Anatomy and physiology of the lower urinary tract. Urol Clin North Am 1993;20:383–401.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Andersson KE. The pharmacology of lower urinary tract smooth muscles and penile erectile tissues. Pharmacol Rev 1993;45:253–308.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Andersson KE. Advances in the pharmacological control of the bladder. Exp Physiol 1999;84:195–213.[Abstract]
  6. Clemeth D, Jarvis B. Tolterodine: a review of its use in the treatment of overactive bladder. Drugs Aging 2001;18:277–304.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Chen Q, Xue W, Wang Y, et al. Tolterodine for bladder spasm caused by the indwelling catheter after prostate operation. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2004;10:374–5.[Medline]
  8. Nilvebrant L, Andersson KE, Gilberg PG, et al. Tolterodine: a new bladder selective antimuscarinic agent. Eur J Pharmacol 1997;327:195–207.[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Agarwal, G. Yadav, D. Gupta, P. K. Singh, and U. Singh
Evaluation of intra-operative tramadol for prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 506 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Agarwal, D. Gupta, P. Tauzin-Fin, M. Sesay, L. Svartz, M.-C. Houdeck, and P. Maurette
Postoperative catheter-related pain after radical retropubic prostatectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 726 - 727.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Agarwal, S. Dhiraaj, S. Pawar, R. Kapoor, D. Gupta, and P. K. Singh
An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Gabapentin for Prevention of Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1454 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Agarwal, D. Gupta, M. Kumar, S. Dhiraaj, M. Tandon, and P. K. Singh
Ketamine for treatment of catheter related bladder discomfort: a prospective, randomized, placebo controlled and double blind study
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2006; 96(5): 587 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Agarwal, S. Dhiraaj, V. Singhal, R. Kapoor, and M. Tandon
Comparison of efficacy of oxybutynin and tolterodine for prevention of catheter related bladder discomfort: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2006; 96(3): 377 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, U.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press