JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Crystal, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Crystal, G. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Blood
Right arrow Heart

Anesth Analg 2005;101:1261-1268
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181340.28271.4F


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Isoflurane Prevents Platelets from Enhancing Neutrophil-Induced Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction

Guochang Hu, MD, PhD*, M. Ramez Salem, MD*, and George J. Crystal, PhD*{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine; {dagger}Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Address correspondence and reprint requests to George J. Crystal, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate IL Masonic Medical Center, 836 West Wellington Avenue, Chicago, IL 60657–5193. Address e-mail to gcrystal{at}uic.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We evaluated whether platelets can enhance polymorphonuclear neutrophil-induced coronary endothelial dysfunction, and, after observing this, whether isoflurane can prevent the effect. Neutrophils, coronary artery segments, and platelets were obtained from 25 healthy dogs. Coronary artery rings were exposed to neutrophils activated with platelet-activating factor (1.0 µM), and after washing and preconstriction with U46619, were evaluated for concentration-related responses to acetylcholine, an endothelium-dependent vasorelaxing drug. Superoxide production by activated neutrophils was measured spectrophotometrically. Adherence of the activated neutrophils to the endothelium of coronary segments was assessed by direct counting of neutrophils labeled with fluorescent dye. Measurements were performed in absence and presence of isoflurane (1 minimum alveolar concentration) both with and without platelets. The presence of platelets enhanced the neutrophil-induced rightward shift in the concentration-vasorelaxation response curve to acetylcholine (the concentration of acetylcholine required to elicit 50% of maximal relaxation (–log M) was increased from 6.78 ± 0.7 to 5.26 ± 0.6), and it increased superoxide oxide production from 45.0 ± 4.2 to 54.3 ± 4.2 nM O2/5 x 106 neutrophils and adherence of activated neutrophils from 204 ± 10 to 268 ± 5 neutrophils/mm2. Isoflurane abolished these effects of platelets. In conclusion, platelets enhanced the ability of neutrophils to cause coronary endothelial dysfunction. This effect was prevented by isoflurane. This may be attributable to an inhibitory action on superoxide production by the neutrophils leading to reduced expression of endothelial adhesion molecules and, in turn, reduced neutrophil adherence.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Evidence has emerged indicating interactions between neutrophils and platelets (1–4). Either type of cell may release soluble factors that activate the other type or increase its response to stimulating agents. The primary mechanism for the platelet-neutrophil interaction appears to be a direct receptor ligand interaction involving P-selectin on the surface of the platelets and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) on the neutrophil surface. Platelets have been shown to enhance superoxide production by neutrophils, neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells, and neutrophil-induced, postischemic cardiac dysfunction in vitro (4–6) and to enhance neutrophil adhesion and postangioplasty vasoconstriction in the carotid artery in vivo (7). These findings all suggest an ability of platelets to enhance neutrophil-induced endothelial dysfunction, but this has not been confirmed experimentally.

Volatile anesthetics have been demonstrated to protect the myocardium against ischemic-reperfusion injury (8), but despite extensive investigation, the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. Activation of protective signaling pathways within the myocytes involving the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels appears to play a prominent role (8), but various lines of evidence have suggested that inhibitory actions on inflammatory pathways may also be involved. First, isoflurane reduced neutrophil adherence to the endothelium and the cardiac and endothelial dysfunction caused by the activated neutrophils (9–12). Furthermore, isoflurane reduced the cytokine-induced death of cultured endothelial and smooth muscle cells and the release of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (13).

Although some studies have shown that isoflurane has no effect on platelet function (14–16), others have suggested that it has an inhibitory effect at clinically relevant concentrations (17–20). In addition, several reports have demonstrated that volatile anesthetics can modulate the formation of platelet-neutrophil aggregates and expression of P-selectin on platelets but that these effects may differ among the various anesthetics (21–23). No study has assessed whether isoflurane (or any other volatile anesthetic) can affect the ability of platelets to modulate neutrophil-induced coronary endothelial dysfunction. Such information is important in gaining a more complete understanding of the mechanisms by which volatile anesthetics protect the myocardium from reperfusion injury in vivo.

The first objective of this study was to demonstrate the ability of platelets to enhance neutrophil-induced coronary endothelial dysfunction. After this was accomplished, we evaluated the effect of isoflurane on this phenomenon. Mechanistic insights were obtained by evaluating the associated changes in superoxide production and vascular adherence of the activated neutrophils.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The study was conducted after approval from the institutional animal research committee at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Experiments were performed on 25 healthy, heartworm-free mongrel dogs of either sex (weight, 18–26 kg). The dogs were anesthetized with an IV bolus injection of 30 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital and mechanically ventilated (Air Shields Inc, Hatboro, PA) with oxygen-enriched room air. The right carotid artery was cannulated to permit withdrawal of blood for separation of neutrophils and platelets.

Neutrophils were separated as described previously (11). Arterial blood was collected in tubes and anticoagulated with 1.6% citric acid and 2.5% sodium citrate (pH 5.4) in 10 mL of 6% dextran solution in buffered Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS). The blood was maintained at room temperature while erythrocytes sedimented (approximately 40 min). The leukocyte-rich plasma layer was carefully aspirated and centrifuged at 500g at 4°C for 10 min. Contaminating erythrocytes in the pellet were removed by hypotonic lysis for 20 s with 9 mL of sterile distilled water. Subsequent addition of 3 mL of 0.6 M KCl and 15 mL of buffered HBSS rapidly returned the cells to isotonicity. The leukocyte-rich suspension was centrifuged at 500g at 4°C for 10 min, after which time the cells were resuspended in 2 mL of HBSS, layered on the top of 3 mL of Ficoll-Pacque, and centrifuged again at 800g at 4°C for 20 min. The resulting pellet was rinsed with HBSS. The neutrophils were resuspended in HBSS in preparation before experimental use. Our procedure for neutrophil isolation yields neutrophil suspensions that are 98% pure and more than 95% viable as evaluated by Wright’s staining and trypan blue exclusion (11,24).

Platelets were isolated by centrifugation as described previously (25). Briefly, arterial blood was collected in tubes and combined with citrate anticoagulant A to yield final concentrations of 9.3 mM sodium citrate, 0.7 mM citric acid, and 14 mM dextrose. This blood was then centrifuged at 55g at 4°C for 40 min. The platelet-rich plasma layer was carefully collected and added into an equal volume of cold citrate anticoagulant B solution (in mM: sodium citrate 93, citric acid 7, dextrose 105, and KCl 5, pH 6.5), and then the mixture was centrifuged at 600g at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the resulting platelet pellet was resuspended in a small volume of the citrate anticoagulant B. A platelet count of this suspension was obtained manually after Wright’s staining (24).

To quantify neutrophil-induced damage to the endothelium, dogs were killed with an overdose of IV pentobarbital sodium (80 mg/kg), and the heart was rapidly excised and immediately placed into cold (4°C), oxygenated Krebs solution with the following composition (mM): NaCl 118, KCl 4.75, MgSO4 1.19, KH2PO4 1.12, CaCl2 2.54, NaHCO3 12.5, glucose 10. The left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries were carefully dissected, cleaned of connective and adipose tissue without disturbing the endothelium, and cut into rings 2–3 mm in length as described previously (11). The rings were mounted on stainless steel hooks, placed into organ baths containing 10 mL of Krebs solution aerated with a gas mixture of 95%O2–5% CO2 at 37°C, and connected to isometric force transducers (Radnoti Model TR 001). Changes in isometric force were digitized at 3 Hz using an analog-to-digital converter and analyzed using a videographic program (SPECTRUM®; Triton Technology, San Diego, CA). The rings were initially stretched to yield a preload of 1.0 g of tension. After equilibration for 20 min, the contraction response to KCl (30 mM) was determined as tension was increased in 1.0-g steps until the maximal response was observed. This prestretch tension was used in subsequent procedures. The rings were then thoroughly washed and the optimal contracting dose for U46619 (Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI), a thromboxane A2 mimetic agent, was determined. A concentration-response curve for U46619 was generated for each ring using concentrations over the range 2.5 to 5.0 nM. The concentration for U46619 that caused the maximal contracting effect was used to provide vascular tone in the acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) trials. After a thorough washing, the rings were allowed to stabilize at baseline tension for 20 min and then carefully removed from the chamber. The rings were then placed in tightly capped glass test tubes containing Krebs solution saturated with oxygen within a heated (37°C) shaking bath. Neutrophils (1 x 107 cells/mL), platelet-activating factor (PAF; 1 µM) (11), and platelets (1 x 108 cells/mL), when appropriate, were added to the tubes alone or together with 0.30 mM isoflurane in Krebs solution and incubated for 25 min. This millimolar concentration for isoflurane was calculated using an isoflurane 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 1.4 vol % for the dog (26) and a buffer/gas partition coefficient of 0.55 at 37°C and 1 atm (27). A stable level of isoflurane during all experimental protocols was confirmed by gas chromatography. The concentrations for PAF and isoflurane in the ring studies were also used in the superoxide and adherence studies described below. The main experimental groups in the ring studies were as follows: 1) control; no neutrophils, PAF, or platelets; 2) PAF and neutrophils; 3) PAF, neutrophils, and platelets; 4) PAF, neutrophils, and isoflurane; 5) PAF, neutrophils, platelets, and isoflurane. Additional validation studies were conducted with platelets both alone and with PAF and with neutrophils alone.

After the incubation period with the inflammatory cells, the rings were assessed for endothelial function. The rings were removed from the test tubes and washed three times with Krebs solution to remove neutrophils, platelets, PAF, and isoflurane. They were then re-mounted in the chambers, and allowed to stabilize at the appropriate pre-tension for 40 min. Indomethacin (10 µM) was added to the chambers to prevent vascular responses to prostaglandins (11,32). Once a stable contraction to the predetermined U46619 dose was obtained, endothelial function was assessed from cumulative concentration-response curves to the endothelium-dependent dilator ACh (10–9 to 10–6 M). After the rings were again washed and allowed to stabilize, vascular smooth muscle function was assessed from the curves to the endothelium-independent dilator SNP (10–9 to 10–6 M). Drug concentrations are expressed as the final concentrations in the organ chamber.

Superoxide production by neutrophils in suspension was determined by measuring the superoxide dismutase (SOD) inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome c to ferrocytochrome c (11). Neutrophils (5 x 106 cells/mL) or/and platelets (5 x 107 cells/mL) were prewarmed in a shaking incubator at 37°C with 160 µM cytochrome c and 5 µg/mL cytochalasin B in the absence (control) or presence of the test agents for 5 min and then stimulated with PAF. Half of the tubes were provided with an excess of SOD (100 µg/mL) as a control for nonspecific activity or color generation. Five min after adding PAF, cytochrome c reduction was measured spectrophotometrically by determining the optical density of the supernatant at 550 nm, using a Vmax kinetic microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA). Superoxide production was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 21 mM–1cm–1 for cytochrome c. Results are expressed as nM of SOD-inhibitable O2 produced by a suspension of 5 x 106 neutrophils/mL. The experimental groups were the same as those in the endothelial dysfunction studies described above. Further validation studies were performed to determine the ability of the PAF-activated platelets alone to produce superoxide.

Neutrophil adherence to the endothelial surface of the coronary artery segments was assessed using neutrophils labeled with a vital fluorescent dye, as described previously (11). Briefly, 1 mL of 4 µM solution of PKH26 dye was added to 1 mL of a neutrophil suspension (2 x 107 cells/mL). After the sample was gently mixed, it was incubated at room temperature for 5 min; the labeling reaction was stopped by adding 2 mL plasma and incubating for 1 min. The plasma-stopped sample was diluted with 4 mL of HBSS and then centrifuged at 400g for 10 min at 4°C. The resultant cell pellet was transferred to a new tube for additional duplicate washings, and the cells were resuspended. This labeling procedure yields neutrophils possessing normal viability and function (11).

Coronary artery rings were carefully opened without damaging the endothelium and placed in the tube containing 3 mL of HBSS with Ca2+ at 37°C. Labeled neutrophils were added to each tube to achieve a final concentration of 5 x 106 neutrophils/mL. The coronary vascular segments were incubated with labeled neutrophils in the absence and presence of platelets (5 x 107 cells/mL) and isoflurane for 20 min. PAF was used as an activator of the cells. After removing the vascular segments, they were flushed gently with HBSS. Neutrophil adherence was determined by counting the number of neutrophils adhering to the endothelial surface in six separate microscopic fields under epifluorescent microscopy (490-nm excitation, 504-nm emission) (Fryer Company, Inc, Huntley, IL), and expressed per square millimeter of endothelium. The experimental groups were the same as those in the endothelial dysfunction studies described above.

The following chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO): acetylcholine chloride, SNP, Ficoll-Pacque, SOD, cytochrome c, cytochalasin B, PKH26 dye, and indomethacin. PAF and HBSS without Mg2+ and Ca2+ were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL) and Meditech, Inc. (Salt Lake City, UT), respectively. All solutions were prepared freshly on the day of the study.

Concentration-responses for vascular relaxation were calculated as a percentage of the decrease of U46619-induced isometric force. The drug concentration required to elicit 50% of the maximum relaxation response (EC50) was calculated by linear regression analysis and expressed as the negative logarithm of the drug concentration (–log [M]). The maximal relaxation response (Rmax, %) was also determined. An Rmax value equal to 100% indicated complete reversal of U46619-induced contraction. A one-way analysis of variance in combination with the Student-Newman-Keuls test were used to evaluate treatment effects on superoxide production and neutrophil adherence (28). Within- and between-group differences for coronary vascular relaxation responses were assessed using a two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test (28). A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant throughout the study.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACh caused concentration-dependent relaxation responses in the control coronary rings (Fig. 1A). Unactivated neutrophils had no effect on these responses. Activating the neutrophils with PAF reduced the relaxation responses of the coronary rings to ACh, as reflected in a rightward shift in the concentration-response curve, a reduction in the maximum response, and an increase in the EC50 (Fig. 1A and Table 1). Combining the PAF-activated neutrophils with platelets enhanced these effects. Isoflurane reversed the impairment to ACh-induced coronary relaxation caused by the PAF-activated neutrophils both alone and combined with platelets. The concentration-related vascular relaxation responses to SNP remained unchanged under all conditions (Fig. 1B). Neither platelets alone or combined with PAF nor neutrophils alone altered the vascular relaxation responses caused by ACh (data not shown).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of unactivated neutrophils (PMNs) and platelet-activating factor (PAF)-activated PMNs alone and in the presence of isoflurane (ISO) with and without platelets (PLT) on relaxation responses of coronary artery rings to acetylcholine (A) and sodium nitroprusside (B). *P < 0.05 versus control; {dagger}P < 0.05 versus PMN+PAF. Values are mean ± se. Number of coronary rings for each condition presented in Table 1.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of Isoflurane on Changes in Coronary Vascular Relaxation Responses Caused by Neutrophils Alone and Combined with Platelets

 

Figure 2 presents the effects of isoflurane on superoxide production by PAF-stimulated neutrophils alone and in the presence of platelets. PAF stimulation of neutrophils caused a ninefold increase in superoxide production. This response was greater in the presence of platelets. Isoflurane inhibited superoxide production by neutrophils alone and it abolished the ability of platelets to enhance this production. PAF-activated platelets alone produced a negligible amount of superoxide.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of isoflurane (ISO) on superoxide production (O2) by platelet-activating factor (PAF)-stimulated neutrophils (PMNs) alone and in the presence of platelets (PLT). *P < 0.05 versus PMN; {dagger}P < 0.05 versus corresponding without ISO. Values are mean ± se of at least eight observations.

 

Figure 3 demonstrates that PAF caused a pronounced increase neutrophil adherence to the coronary artery rings, which was enhanced by the presence of platelets. Isoflurane reduced adherence of the activated neutrophils alone and also abolished the platelet-induced enhancement of this effect.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of isoflurane (ISO) on platelet-activating factor (PAF)-stimulated adherence of neutrophils to coronary vascular endothelium in the absence and presence of platelets (PLT). *P < 0.05 versus PMN; {dagger}P < 0.05 versus corresponding without ISO. Values are mean ± se of at least 8 coronary rings.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The current findings demonstrated for the first time that platelets can enhance neutrophil-induced coronary endothelial dysfunction and that isoflurane can prevent this effect.

There is an extensive body of evidence suggesting that interactions between neutrophils and platelets may be important in the pathophysiology of myocardial and coronary endothelial reperfusion injury (1–4). Platelet-neutrophil conjugates have been demonstrated to enhance neutrophil activation and neutrophil-induced cardiac injury (5,6), as reflected by the enhanced increases in superoxide production, vascular adherence, and the coronary endothelial dysfunction observed in the current study. Previous studies have suggested that platelets promote neutrophil activation via the release of several mediators, including thromboxane A2, platelet-derived growth factor, platelet factor 4, and serotonin (3). Although the main mechanism for platelet-neutrophil interactions is P-selectin on the surface of the platelets and PSGL-1 on the surface of the neutrophils, other mechanisms have been implicated. These include 1) fibrinogen bridging via GPIIb/IIIa on the platelet and the ß2 integrin MAC-1 (CD11b/CD18) on the neutrophil, 2) thrombospondin bridging via GPIa/IIa, GPIIb/IIIa, or GPIV on the platelet and a specific receptor on the neutrophil, and 3) platelet intercellular adhesion molecule-2 (ICAM-2) binding to neutrophil lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) (29).

Platelets can adhere to the endothelium via glycoprotein 1b on the platelet surface and von Willebrand factor in the vessel wall and this interaction can cause release of chemotactic proteins and expression of adhesion molecules in the endothelium, thus promoting neutrophil-endothelial interactions and endothelial injury (30). Although this mechanism may have played a role in our adherence and vascular relaxation studies, it could not have been involved in the superoxide studies, which did not include coronary arterial segments.

It has been demonstrated that the platelets themselves can produce superoxide but, as confirmed in our validation studies, this production is much smaller than that of the neutrophils and is likely limited to intracellular signaling (31). We also demonstrated that activated platelets in the absence of neutrophils had no effect on the relaxation responses of the coronary artery segments. These findings, when taken together, would seem to eliminate the possibility that the enhanced endothelial dysfunction caused by the platelet-neutrophil combination was attributable to an independent effect of the platelets.

Activated neutrophils produce superoxide, whose action on the coronary vasculature can result in endothelial dysfunction. Superoxide production by the neutrophil can be via adherence-independent or adherence-dependent pathways (32). Our superoxide production and vascular adherence findings suggest that the platelets enhanced both these pathways and that isoflurane abolished these effects.

The mechanisms by which isoflurane inhibited the platelet-induced enhancement of neutrophil-induced endothelial dysfunction remain to be clarified. Several potential mechanisms can be proposed:

1. Isoflurane had an inhibitory effect on the platelets, which reduced interactions between the platelets and both the neutrophils and endothelium. Previous studies are equivocal regarding a potential role for this mechanism. Some have shown that isoflurane does not affect platelet function (15), whereas others have suggested that it has an inhibitory effect at clinically relevant concentrations (19). Moreover, studies have suggested that isoflurane may have a facilitating, rather than inhibitory, effect on expression of P-selectin in activated platelets and on platelet-neutrophil binding (21). However, the use of a larger concentration for isoflurane (2 MAC), different agonists (adenosine diphosphate and thrombin receptor agonist protein TRAP-6), and cells contained in whole blood samples from a different species (humans) make it difficult to extrapolate these latter findings to the present study. Although isoflurane has been shown to reduce thrombin-induced platelet adherence to the coronary vascular endothelium in isolated guinea pig hearts (19), it has also been shown to increase expression of glycoprotein 1b in adenosine diphosphate-activated platelets in vitro (23). This suggests that the former finding may reflect an inhibitory effect on the endothelium rather than on the platelets.

2. Isoflurane had an inhibitory effect on the neutrophils that rendered them unresponsive to the stimulatory action of the platelets. PAF binds to a specific receptor on the neutrophil membrane, which is the first event in the signal transduction sequence. Ultimately, the production of superoxide by the neutrophil results from activation and assembly of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, which is a transmembrane electron transport chain that reduces oxygen to superoxide. The isoflurane-induced inhibition of superoxide production by neutrophils alone in the current study could be attributable to a direct inhibitory effect on NADPH oxidase or to an inhibitory effect at some site in the signal transduction pathway regulating NADPH oxidase, e.g., the PAF receptor on the neutrophil membrane or the GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) that are involved in transduction of agonist signals. This inhibitory action of isoflurane on NADPH oxidase may prevent modulation from upstream stimulatory mediators, including those released by the platelets.

3. Isoflurane had a protective effect on the coronary endothelium that prevented the dysfunction caused by activated neutrophils both alone and in the presence of platelets. Free radicals released from neutrophils, e.g., superoxide, provide a stimulus for up-regulation of endothelial adhesion molecules (33). The main endothelial adhesion molecules are P-selectin, which mediates the initial "rolling" and slowing of neutrophils along the endothelial surface, and ICAM-1, which mediates the later firm adherence of neutrophils to the endothelial cell surface (11). In the PAF-stimulated in vitro system used in the current study, adherence is via ICAM-1 (32). We have demonstrated in an isolated rat heart preparation (in the absence of platelets) that selective exposure of the coronary vasculature to isoflurane can reduce adherence of activated neutrophils (10). Although not confirmed by direct measurements, this reduced adherence would likely have resulted in better preserved endothelial function. Exposure to isoflurane may protect the coronary endothelium from the deleterious effects of activated neutrophils both in the absence and presence of platelets.

Our findings confirm our previous work indicating that isoflurane has a profound inhibitory effect on neutrophil activation and functions (11). In this regard, it is noteworthy that isoflurane was capable of attenuating, but not abolishing, the increase in superoxide production by the activated neutrophils, whereas it could completely abolish the neutrophil-induced endothelial dysfunction and the associated increases in neutrophil adherence. This apparent quantitative divergence can be reconciled if the ability of activated neutrophils to interact and cause dysfunction within the endothelium was a threshold phenomenon and isoflurane was able to reduce neutrophil activation below the critical level.

PAF is a highly active phospholipid that has been implicated in inflammatory responses and cardiac reperfusion injury in vivo (34). Exogenous PAF was used as an agonist in the present study because of its well-established ability to activate the three cell types investigated: neutrophils, platelets, and endothelial cells. We followed previous studies and treated the coronary vascular rings with indomethacin to inhibit prostaglandin synthesis (11,32). Although indomethacin has been demonstrated to increase the sensitivity of canine coronary arteries to the constrictor effects of U46619 (35), there is no reason to expect that this would have influenced our results or conclusions.

A blunted response to the endothelium-dependent vasorelaxing drug ACh could reflect impaired endothelial or vascular smooth function. SNP, a nitric oxide donor, is an endothelium-independent vasorelaxing drug that was used to differentiate between these possibilities. The inability of neutrophils alone, or combined with platelets, to attenuate the responses to SNP implied well preserved vascular smooth function and suggested endothelial dysfunction as an explanation for the blunted responses to ACh.

In a previous investigation (11), we performed a control study that indicated that treatment with isoflurane alone did not alter the ACh vasorelaxation curve. This finding eliminates the possibility that isoflurane’s beneficial effect on ACh-induced coronary relaxation in the studies involving activated neutrophils and platelets was caused by an enhancement of baseline endothelial function and was not related to protection against neutrophil- and/or platelet-induced endothelial damage.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that isoflurane can inhibit the ability of platelets to enhance neutrophil-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction in the coronary circulation. Our findings provide additional support for the notion that the cardioprotective effects of isoflurane involve inhibitory actions on inflammatory cells and their interactions, as well as KATP channel-dependent signaling pathways within myocytes (8).

The authors thank Derrick L. Harris, BS, for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
Supported, in part, by funding from the Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Orlando, Florida, October 12–16, 2002.

Accepted for publication June 10, 2005.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Li N, Hu H, Lindqvist M, et al. Platelet-leukocyte cross talk in whole blood. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:2702–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dore M. Platelet-leukocyte interactions. Am Heart J 1998;135:S146–51.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Siminiak T, Flores NA, Sheridan DJ. Neutrophil interactions with endothelium and platelets: possible role in the development of cardiovascular injury. Eur Heart J 1995;16:160–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kogaki S, Sawa Y, Matsushita T, et al. Selectin on activated platelets enhances neutrophil endothelial adherence in myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 1999;43:968–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Naum CC, Kaplan SS, Basford RE. Platelets and ATP prime neutrophils for enhanced O2 generation at low concentrations but inhibit O2 generation at high concentrations. J Leukoc Biol 1991;49:83–9.[Abstract]
  6. Lefer AM, Campbell B, Scalia R, Lefer DJ. Synergism between platelets and neutrophils in provoking cardiac dysfunction after ischemia and reperfusion: role of selections. Circulation 1998;98:1322–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Merhi Y, Provost P, Guidoin R, Latour J-G. Importance of platelets in neutrophil adhesion and vasoconstriction after deep carotid arterial injury by angioplasty in pigs. Arterioscler Thromb 1997;17:1185–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tanaka K, Ludwig LM, Kersten JR, et al. Mechanisms of cardioprotection by volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology 2004;100:707–21.[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Hu G, Vasiliauskas T, Salem MR, et al. Neutrophils pretreated with volatile anesthetics lose ability to cause cardiac dysfunction. Anesthesiology 2003;98:712–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Hu G, Salem MR, Crystal GJ. Isoflurane and sevoflurane precondition against neutrophil-induced contractile dysfunction in isolated rat hearts. Anesthesiology 2004;100:489–97.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Hu G, Vinten-Johansen J, Salem MR, et al. Isoflurane inhibits neutrophil-endothelium interactions in the coronary circulation: lack of role for adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels. Anesth Analg 2002;94:849–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mobert J, Zahler S, Becker BF, Conzen PF. Inhibition of neutrophil activation by volatile anesthetics decreases adhesion to cultured human endothelial cells. Anesthesiology 1999;90:1372–81.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. de Klaver MJ, Manning L, Palmer LA, Rich GF. Isoflurane pretreatment inhibits cytokine-induced cell death in cultured rat smooth muscle cells and human endothelial cells. Anesthesiology 2002;97:24–32.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Hirakata H, Ushikubi F, Toda H, et al. Sevoflurane inhibits human platelet aggregation and thromboxane A2 formation, possibly by suppression of cyclooxygenase activity. Anesthesiology 1996;85:1447–53.[Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Hirakata H, Ushikubi F, Narumiya S, et al. The effect of inhaled anesthetics on the platelet aggregation and the ligand-binding affinity of the platelet thromboxane A2 receptor. Anesth Analg 1995;81:114–8.[Abstract]
  16. Kohro S, Yamakage M. Direct inhibitory mechanisms of halothane on human platelet aggregation. Anesthesiology 1996;85:96–106.[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Hönemann CW, Nietgen GW, Podranski T, et al. Influence of volatile anesthetics on thromboxane A2 signaling. Anesthesiology 1998;88:440–51.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Blaise GA, Parent M, Laurin S, et al. Platelet-induced vasomotion of isolated canine coronary artery in the presence of halothane or isoflurane. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994;8:175–81.[Medline]
  19. Heindl B, Becker BF, Zahler S, Conzen PF. Volatile anaesthetics reduce adhesion of blood platelets under low-flow conditions in the coronary system of isolated guinea pig hearts. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:995–1003.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Fauss BG, Meadows JC, Bruni CY, Qureshi GD. The in vitro and in vivo effects of isoflurane and nitrous oxide on platelet aggregation. Anesth Analg 1986;65:1170–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. de Rossi LW, Horn NA, Hecker KE, et al. Effect of halothane and isoflurane on binding of ADP- and TRAP-6-activated platelets to leukocytes in whole blood. Anesthesiology 2002;96:117–24.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Horn NA, de Rossi L, Robitzsch T, et al. The effects of sevoflurane and desflurane in vitro platelet-leukocyte adhesion in whole blood. Anaesthesia 2003;58:312–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Fröhlich D, Rothe G, Schmitz G, Hansen E. Volatile anaesthetics induced in the expression of P-selectin and glycoprotein 1b on the surface of platelets in vitro. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998;15:641–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Pearson PJ, Schaff HV, Vanhoutte PM. Acute impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxations to aggregating platelets following reperfusion injury in canine coronary arteries. Circ Res 1990;67:385–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kiechenbaum LA, Aziz M, Astiz ME, et al. Influence of rheologic changes and platelet-neutrophil interactions on cell filtration in sepsis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2000;161:1602–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Koblin DD, Eger EI II, Johnson BH, et al. Minimum alveolar concentrations and oil/gas partition coefficients of four anesthetic isomers. Anesthesiology 1981;54:314–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Lerman J, Willis MM, Gregory GA, Eger EI II. Osmolarity determines the solubility of anesthetics in aqueous solutions at 37°C. Anesthesiology 1983;59:554–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
  29. Merhi Y, Provost P, Chauvet P, et al. Selectin blockade reduces neutrophil interaction with platelets at the site of deep arterial injury by angioplasty in pigs. Arteriocler Throm Vasc Biol 1999;19:372–7.
  30. Gawaz M. Role of platelets in coronary thrombosis and reperfusion in ischemic myocardium. Cardiovasc Res 2004;61:498–511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Seno T, Inoue N, Gao D, et al. Involvement of NADH/NADPH oxidase in human platelet ROS production. Thrombosis Res 2001;103:399–409.[Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Zhao ZQ, Sato H, Williams MW, et al. Adenosine A2-receptor activation inhibits neutrophil-mediated injury to coronary endothelium. Am J Physiol 1996;27:H1456–64.
  33. Fan H, Sun B, Gu Q, et al. Oxygen radicals trigger activation of NF-{kappa} B and AP-1 and upregulation of ICAM-1 in reperfused canine heart. Am J Physiol 2002;282:H1778–86.
  34. Montrucchio G, Alloatti G, Camussi G. Role of platelet-activating factor in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 2000;80:1669–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dusting GJ, Angus JA. Interaction of epoprostenol (PGI2) with vasoconstrictors on diameter of large coronary arteries of the dog. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1984;6:20–7.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Crystal, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Crystal, G. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Blood
Right arrow Heart


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press