| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Professor and Holder of the Margaret Milam McDermott Distinguished Chair in, Anesthesiology Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, paul.white{at}utsouthwestern.edu
To the Editor:
In reading the article by Meyer et al. (1) suggesting that dolasetron (12.5 mg IV) "provided significantly greater efficacy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting than ondansetron (4 mg IV) because of the need for less rescue therapy," I was surprised to note that Charles H. McLeskey, MD (the senior author) was a member of the Department of Pharmacy at the Texas A&M University System Health Science Center College of Medicine in Temple, Texas. For the past several years, Dr. McLeskey has worked in the medical department at Abbott Laboratories. As Abbott currently markets dolasetron (Anzamet®) for the treatment and prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, this would seem to suggest a potential conflict of interest. Curiously, Dr. McLeskeys association with Abbott was not mentioned anywhere in the manuscript.
Another major concern regarding the authors conclusions relates to the fact that the study design was seriously flawed because the use of prophylactic antiemetics was not strictly controlled in either of the two treatment groups. Given the fact that all well-controlled, prospective comparative studies involving dolasetron and ondansetron have failed to find any differences between these two 5-HT3 antagonists with respect to their antiemetic efficacy (24), the current findings are even more surprising. Hopefully, the results of this study will be confirmed by independent investigative groups without potential conflicts.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Mychaskiw II, A. E. Badr, and A. M. Calimaran Ethics, Marketing, and the Medical Literature Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 488 - 488. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Roberson and T. A. Meyer Ethics, Marketing, and the Medical Literature Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 489 - 489. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Shafer Ethics, Marketing, and the Medical Literature Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 488 - 488. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. White Ethics, Marketing, and the Medical Literature Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 488 - 489. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|