JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, D. H.

Anesth Analg 2006;102:326
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000190718.33168.CA


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Cardiac Arrest During Neuraxial Anesthesia: Are All Databases Comparable?

Donald H. Lambert, PhD, MD

Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, donlam{at}fastmail.us

To the Editor:

In a recent article, Kopp et al. (1) claim the following:

"The survival rate among these patients was similar to the overall rate for our series and suggests that neither the patient population nor the neurological outcome of patients included in the ASA Closed Claims Project is representative of those who arrest during neuraxial block."

This makes little sense because:

  1. The Closed Claims Database (CCDB) (2,3) is 60 times larger than Kopp's.
  2. The outcome at the Mayo Clinic should be better than at the varied hospitals represented in the CCDB, where fewer resources are available compared with a tertiary care facility.
  3. The distribution of serious outcomes in the CCDB does not necessarily match those from a single institution's sample.
  4. Because the CCDB arose from malpractice claims, there can be no meaningful statistical comparisons with the Mayo Clinic's, where cases not involving a malpractice claim are equally likely to be included as those that do.

If all cardiac arrests owing to neuraxial anesthesia occurred in a hospital like the Mayo Clinic, the outcomes might be more favorable than reported by the CCDB. However, the CCDB appears sound and is probably more representative of what happens in the general population.

References

  1. Kopp SL, Horlocker TT, Warner ME, et al. Cardiac arrest during neuraxial anesthesia: frequency and predisposing factors associated with survival. Anesth Analg 2005;100:855–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lee LA, Posner KL, Domino KB, et al. Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2004;101:143–52.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Caplan RA, Ward RJ, Posner K, Cheney FW. Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology 1988;68:5–11.[Web of Science][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, D. H.


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press