Anesth Analg 2006;102:644
© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000197268.69131.2E
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Validation of Institutional Support Survey for Anesthesiology Training Programs in the United States
Kevin K. Tremper, PhD, MD,
Amy Shanks, MS,
Michelle Morris, MS, and
Dave A. Burnett, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, ktremper{at}umich.edu
To the Editor:
This issue of the journal includes the fourth in a series of articles that presents the results of surveys of the financial status and institutional support for United States anesthesiology training programs (1). Since the original survey in 2000, there have been progressive increases in financial support for departments from their institutions to maintain the anesthesiology departments’ financial viability (2,3). These surveys also demonstrate a wide variation in support among institutions. Because of these variations, some concern has been expressed by hospital executive officers regarding the validity of the financial data (personal communication, Dave A. Burnett, MD, Senior Vice-President, University HealthSystem Consortium, Oak Brook, IL).
To assess the accuracy of the financial support data, the following small validation survey has been conducted. The Chief Financial Officers of 10 institutions, which were included in the most recent survey, were contacted and asked the same financial support question that they had submitted to the clinical chairs of their anesthesiology departments.1 The mean and median for those same 10 departments are presented below (Table 1). Although the support dollars are not identical, the mean values are within approximately 5%. This level of agreement provides some degree of assurance that overall results of the survey are valid. Interestingly, the mean support dollars data from the chief financial officers is larger than that from the department chairs. The differences in dollar amount may be due to differences in interpreting what to include in the support from the hospital, e.g., the inclusion of graduate medical education dollars. We conclude from this small subsurvey that the survey results are most likely an accurate representation of the state of financial support of the anesthesiology training programs in the United States.
Footnotes
1 Departments Surveyed: Brigham and Women’s, Emory, Johns Hopkins, University of Kansas, University of Florida, University of Maryland, University of Michigan, University of Virginia, UCSF, Wake Forest. 
References
- Tremper KK, Shanks A, Morris M. Trends in financial status of United States anesthesiology training programs: 2000 to 2004. Anesth Analg 2006;102:517-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tremper KK, Shanks A, Sliwinski M, et al. Faculty and finances of United States anesthesiology training programs: 2002-2003. Anesth Analg 2004;99:1185-92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tremper KK, Barker SJ, Gelman S, et al. A demographic, service, and financial survey of anesthesia training programs in the United States. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1432-46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
S. Kheterpal, K. K. Tremper, A. Shanks, and M. Morris
Six-Year Follow-Up on Work Force and Finances of the United States Anesthesiology Training Programs: 2000 to 2006
Anesth. Analg.,
January 1, 2009;
108(1):
263 - 272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. K. Tremper, A. Shanks, and M. Morris
Five-Year Follow-Up on the Work Force and Finances of United States Anesthesiology Training Programs: 2000 to 2005
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2007;
104(4):
863 - 868.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
